- Tibetz
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)
Posted by: ImTriForceGuy
Posted by: Tibetz
Posted by: ImTriForceGuy
Im sorry, do you not find this stupid?
I understand the the implication of Natal and the far stretching reach it could have. I know its a huge step for gaming, I just feel its a huge step in the wrong direction.
[/quote]
So, you want to stay in controller land forever, or do you want to get to the point that Virtual reality is possible, where every movement is actually just impulses from your brain to your body intercepted by a computer and relayed onto a game screen?
thought so.
Posted by: x MibZ x
Halo 3: ODST comes with a multiplayer beta for the game. If Reach used Natal, how exactly would we play the demo?
Natal is an add-on. Its basically a souped up vision cam.
again, what does that have to do with Reach in the slightest?
The video was just an example of what I meant by me thinking it was stupid.
Honestly I think that Natal would be good for nothing more then a cheesy party gimmick...
and I think it would ruin Halo.
Some things may be incorporated and I really hope we have the option to not use it.
Natal is a step forward in gaming. Maybe not FPS's, which I more or less agree with, but it is a future investment for Virtual Reality, which MOST DEFINITELY would be awesome in FPS's.
But honestly, I am a fan of Dragonballz, and considering the accuracy of the movement on the screen, I can see the game being ALL natal, or at least mostly natal. A Joystick all by itself with buttons for types of attack (hold a for punches, hold b for kicks, hold c for ki, which includes special attack motions).
Along with the NATAL incorporated gameplay, it could be played with a controller.