Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Reach is Halo 3 Legendary planet *Version 2.0*
  • Subject: Reach is Halo 3 Legendary planet *Version 2.0*
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Reach is Halo 3 Legendary planet *Version 2.0*

This space for rent or lease.

Ahh, that made me lol :)

  • 06.17.2009 6:11 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Unseen Blade
The camera is in positions that we don't know, so we can easily tell that these 2 are the same planet. For one, they both have spherical objects in the backround that give off light. This is completely compelling proof that they are the same planet. More proof is that they are both spheres and both have symbols on them. The symbols are exactly the same except for the fact that are different in size, shape, color, and just about every other aspect.


This is where your theory was killed. I bolded and underlined it.^

  • 06.17.2009 6:14 PM PDT

THIS IS FOR KAT!!!!!!

I think people are overthinking this isn't it possible it could just be a prequel. I know that some people have wanted bungie to make a prequel for a while so maybe since this will probally be Bungies last halo project they just wanted to try a prequel and see how it works out.

  • 06.17.2009 6:19 PM PDT

Major C.B.

Posted by: Unseen Blade
Oh, and if you say the suns are different color, if you look closely, you will see that the light is coming from the moons (just like in Halo 3's ending) and not that red sun. The night time makes it so that the moons reflect blue (because the large ocean is now under it) in the Halo 3 ending.


There is errrr... Well, how to say this? Let me answer this with a question... Where does the moon get its light? Bingo! The sun! The moon is NOT a source of light, the sun is the ONLY source of light. If you'll observe our own night sky, it is still blue; like our daytime sky. Only difference is that it's a much darker shade of blue, because the sun is not directly shining, but the rays are bouncing off the moon. It should still theoretically be the same color if it were the same planet, because the star IS the overwhelming source of light, and the moon is NOT a source of light. The moon, again, just reflects the sun's light.

Also, all your articles, etc, about time travel are very lovely, but there's one glaring issue here: time travel is, thus far, fictional. It has never been achieved. As a result, the physics, as well as the effects and consequences, are unknown. Therefore, you would have to pull these "facts" from other fictional sources, and almost every fictional source has their own definition of time travel. In essence, there is no way you could know that time travel changes the shape of things. There is this little law called the conservation of energy and matter. It states that energy or matter can never be created or destroyed, only transferred or broken down. That in mind, how do you propose the supposed time rift created an entire front half of a ship, paint and all, from nothing? Are you proposing that the shape, function, paint job of the front half of the ship were all created in the time rift, arranged in that exact manner by random chance?

No, I won't go further. Mainly because this is a joke thread (:
Hahah.

  • 06.17.2009 6:40 PM PDT

Posted by: Dream053
No it doesn't. It just makes it sound like a time travel theorist is completly retarded without giving any reason why it's so stupid. I could do the same with any other theory but would rather not waste my time. [/quote]
Yes, it does. But since you can't be bothered to discern such on your own, I'll sum it up for you:

The Reach = Legendary Planetoid theories, and the time travel theories especially are based on the assumption that the other is true, and so they go hand in hand. Both are founded off of unprecedented speculative musings that are borderline pareidolia, and have no proper foundations to bring cause for consideration. The image comparisons are not only ridiculous because they do not match in any form aside from shape and horizon lighting (a point expressed in the OP), but also because the images themselves aren't even reliable given what limited lighting we do have. However, from what we do have, they do not match whatsoever.

Couple this with the fact that the game has been officially called a "prequel" and not a "sequel", it should be obvious that time travel is not involved with Reach. If Master Chief and Cortana traveled back in time to Reach, and this game was focused on that, it would not be a prequel, it would be a sequel as it is the next series of events to occur in their non-chronological timelines.

Furthermore, Bungie has expressed long ago that time travel has no place in the Halo universe.

There are other reasons why they are stupid theories, but honestly, that is more than enough.

Crackpot theories deserve no serious consideration, and that's exactly what they are.


Nice job, man. Take a bow.

  • 06.17.2009 6:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

dude527, your second paragraph:

I am not supporting the time travel, I think it is the dumbest theory yet but this is a video game and is fictional. They can do as they please because it is a video game. The second half of the parapraph on the other hand, states a very valid point.

  • 06.17.2009 6:56 PM PDT

Major C.B.

Posted by: SnakesOnABanshee
You didn't even understand why I put the definition there. I thought you would figure it out but you didn't. That and you seem to be getting angry at me for disagreeing with you. I'm sorry I made you mad and said you were contradicting yourself but there really is no reason to type out a huge response. I have simply figured out that I can't reason with you and there is no point in proving my point anymore.


Thing is, the other guy has put in relevant information to counter yours. All you've done is shake your head and say, "no." Now you're trying to egg him on to pursue the reason you put the definition in. You didn't tie that point up in your post because you want to lure him in. That's a little to obvious. Sorry, but I don't see him falling victim.

  • 06.17.2009 6:57 PM PDT

Major C.B.

Posted by: Falconx03
dude527, your second paragraph:

I am not supporting the time travel, I think it is the dumbest theory yet but this is a video game and is fictional. They can do as they please because it is a video game. The second half of the parapraph on the other hand, states a very valid point.


It was a joke reply, man. I realize not all of my reply is relevant or even sensical :)

  • 06.17.2009 6:59 PM PDT

Project: HAYABUSA Administrator
Join Today!
--
Proud to follow Jesus.
Posted by: T9404
Uh I'm a bit of a noob, what's an "Achronos"?

Nintenman7: Apply yourself... Seggi31: HHHHNNNNNNGGGGG

Oh. I thought Jupiter and Saturn were the same planet, but you're right, you have absolutely proven that Mars and Jupiter are the same planet, as are the Legendary Ending planet and Reach!

  • 06.17.2009 7:14 PM PDT

Aspiring filmmaker

OP FTW

  • 06.18.2009 4:40 PM PDT

my brain cant take another word about this

  • 06.18.2009 5:32 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3