- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Warghost650
Posted by: animalmother671
Posted by: Warghost650
Sigh, is it really that hard to understand that, according to story line, it would be IMPOSSIBLE to play as the Master Chief?!?! And, if I'm not mistaken, the Fall of Reach took place over TWENTY YEARS before the events of the first game.
Personally I think just think a new, unknown SPARTAN character would be best.
wait hold on there, the fall of reach took place not too long before halo 1, and wasn't it the events of HALO WARS that took place over TWENTY YEARS before halo 1? I think you are mistaken!
I was under the impression that "Halo Wars" covered the story of the Fall of Reach, which is what made me think the Fall took place during said time period. I am no expert on the Halo storyline, so I'm not aiming to start an argument. But from what I do know, or at least think I know, I could swear that the Master Chief is not present during the time of the Fall of Reach. Like I said, though, I could be mistaken.
Well you are mistaken. Halo Wars started on Harvest ended on some forerunner place. Halo 1 started when the Pillar of Autum slipspace jumped away from reach while it was being burned by the Coventant.