- StealthSlasher2
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Brains beats brawn get used to it
Fear the Red Comet
Variety is the spice of life.
Long live games.
Death to all fanboys.
Posted by: Zombie Governor
Yes, i call it Halo 3 Recon because that's the title they announce it as at E3. I am a true BUNGIE fan, so i'm going to stick by what they called it until (obvious) legal action forced them to change the game's name to ODST
_____
Alright, Johnson has VISR mode even though he doesn't have a Helmet. BUNGIE's response to this was ''it's a game, deal with it, he still has VISR mode''. Meaning, BUNGIE isn't being serious about the game's storyline in ODST.
The story's going to fail for this reason, as I think the singleplayer campaign is taking a LOT of lessons from Modern Warfare (an obvious demand by 'microsoft' that halo must take on modern warfare BEFORE It's sequel gets released in November).
Microsoft realized people didn't like to feel all too powerful, and wanted to feel weak and had to use skill and stealth to get through situations, all obvious factors evident in Halo 3 ODST
And now, Microsoft wants to tackle EB GAMES directly as they do not want them to get any more money from USED GAME Sales, since bungie doesn't get any money from it (BUNGIE HAS stated in the past 'we should never stop getting money for a game'). To do this? They take the most popular human, Sgt. Johnson, and make him unlockable in Firefight. This obviously wasn't bungie's idea, at all.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Microsoft is pulling ALL of the strings on the Halo series from now on. BUNGIE has said ODST will be their last halo game, but now they announce they'll be making 'HALO:REACH' after 'Halo Wars' had HORRIBLE Sales. What does that mean? It means Microsoft realized Halo needed BUNGIE to survive, and now is forcing them, through increased pay wages, to continue supporting the halo series.
Yep. Microsoft is officially milking Halo. I'm getting off of this crazy train before it crashes. Peace.
You are quite simply an idiot who is making baseless assumptions and cannot construct a valid point through the muck of random statments that make up your whole "point".