- Dream053
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
I do not appreciate B.Net Group solicitation. If you ignore this and send me an invitation anyway, I will block communications with you.
Posted by: Smug Dark Loser
You fired a halo ring.
Why do people ignore this so much? The truth is, all we know about these is that they essentially wipe out life in the universe. That being said, considering there's the whole theme about "shield and sword" in halo (see cortona's messages or the halo insignia thingy) couldn't there be a shield to this crazy sword called halo?
Granted, that last bit is pure speculation, but my main point is the prior.
Guys, Halo was fired, even though it collapsed. Time travel isn't crazy to imagine. While the attack obviously couldn't sustain itself, whose to say any secondary functions couldn't either?
When has time travel ever been insinuated to be a "secondary function" of a Halo ring?
There is nothing in halo canon (with the exception of I Love Bees, which, again, has conflicting reports on whether it actually is canonical in its entirety, or even at all), that ever brings time travel into question.
To further the unlikelihood of time travel, Staten himself has actively stated that time travel is a corny plot device, and it has no place in the Halo franchise.
There is no evidence to back any of the time travel theories. Imagining is one thing. Suggesting, or worse, asserting that time travel is an explanation to the Legendary Ending with absolutely no foundation for the claim is crazy, annoying, and relatively stupid deduction.