Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Is Halo: Reach going to be using the Halo 3\Halo: ODST game engine?
  • Subject: Is Halo: Reach going to be using the Halo 3\Halo: ODST game engine?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Is Halo: Reach going to be using the Halo 3\Halo: ODST game engine?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: SweetTRIX
Posted by: Reamer
Posted by: SweetTRIX
I would like to point out (due to some comments being made) that a new engine doesn't necessarily mean bigger maps or better gameplay.
I understand that. A new engine doens't promise anything. It could be a worse or better off with one. But I trust Bungie to do great. On the otherhand, I hate Gearbox's games, and I don't like the handeling of them. I'm nervous about Bungie using Gearbox. I don't understand why they partnered with them. They are a class C gaming company in my opinion. And it's not like Bungie couldn't have handpicked anyone else... anyone who has the oppritunity to partner with the guys who own Halo rights knows better than to turn it down.


Real quick, MS owns the Halo IP, not Bungie anymore. Also I have never seen anything from Bungie or MS confirming the involvement of Gearbox in any capacity, but i'd love to see it if you have.
Sorry, I mean I am guessing Gearbox's involment with Bungie. I don't know more about it than anyone (I didn't mean to state as matter-of-fact). You seem to be a little pushy though, but I get that. And I thought MS had the rights, but wasn't sure. Again, sorry to make sound matter-of-fact.

  • 06.22.2009 7:03 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Lineofdeath95
Posted by: Y0U G07 PWN3D
Don't, know about physics, but there's a brand new graphics engine.

With physics, it'll probably be some upgraded Havok system.
Haha, I sure hope not. Havok blows.. but you could be very right.

  • 06.22.2009 7:05 PM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"

Posted by: Reamer
Posted by: SweetTRIX
Posted by: Reamer
Posted by: SweetTRIX
I would like to point out (due to some comments being made) that a new engine doesn't necessarily mean bigger maps or better gameplay.
I understand that. A new engine doens't promise anything. It could be a worse or better off with one. But I trust Bungie to do great. On the otherhand, I hate Gearbox's games, and I don't like the handeling of them. I'm nervous about Bungie using Gearbox. I don't understand why they partnered with them. They are a class C gaming company in my opinion. And it's not like Bungie couldn't have handpicked anyone else... anyone who has the oppritunity to partner with the guys who own Halo rights knows better than to turn it down.


Real quick, MS owns the Halo IP, not Bungie anymore. Also I have never seen anything from Bungie or MS confirming the involvement of Gearbox in any capacity, but i'd love to see it if you have.
Sorry, I mean I am guessing Gearbox's involment with Bungie. I don't know more about it than anyone (I didn't mean to state as matter-of-fact). You seem to be a little pushy though, but I get that. And I thought MS had the rights, but wasn't sure. Again, sorry to make sound matter-of-fact.


Wasn't trying to be pushy, I simply like to know things. Considering how many posts there have been about Gearbox and Halo in the last 6 months, I jump at the chance to know some fact in the sea of speculation. I understand where your coming from.

  • 06.22.2009 8:27 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2