- Dream053
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
I do not appreciate B.Net Group solicitation. If you ignore this and send me an invitation anyway, I will block communications with you.
Posted by: Scop3d
What it all comes down to, my main point which everything else was branched off of, was that Bungie made a MISTAKE to say that ODST was a value oriented title. Obviously $60 is not value oriented. As of now, I doubt very seriously that a campaign, firefight, and three maps are worth $60. But, the fact that they are throwing in the Halo 3 multiplayer is the reason it costs so much. It annoys me when anyone goes back on their word.
That is what I wanted to get across. If none of you can understand this point, I'm better off elsewhere.
The problem here is that what you are purporting Bungie to have said, is not what Bungie actually said. You are better off elsewhere, as you are continually altering your quotation of them to prove a false point.
Despite what people have actively told you, you continue to point the finger at Bungie. Bungie never promised or even implied that the game would be priced lower than a normal retail value of $59.99. They said that they didn't view it as a full-retail price game, and that is all. If you somehow misconstrued that as a "promise", then you need to learn some comprehension skills.
It is common knowledge that Bungie has no rights to the Halo franchise anymore, and with that loss of rights comes the loss of say in the pricing. So no, no negotiations, no haggling, no nothing. They get paid for making the game and that is that.
[Edited on 06.26.2009 9:47 PM PDT]