- SweetTRIX
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"
Posted by: cpage4
Posted by: Killer X 11
No one said it is. I think, it might be about the fall of reach and first strike. But that's just me. Plus who are you to say it's not about the Fall of Reach. Bungie gives us nothing so we can think about it and try to get it on our own.
And lastly who to say it can't be about the book. The game doesn't have to include all the text or make the game word to word. Bungie can include extra stuff.
And FYI, if you see the trailer. I do see reach falling!
I'm not saying it's not going to be the fall of reach. What I am saying is that I think it is not, and I want people to not critisize people for their opinions.
The only theories that have been attacked are those that go against Halo canon and things that Bungie has already commented/weighed in on in times past. Given the wealth of backround information regarding Reach, it doesn't matter if the game is gonna follow the book or not, unless Bungie is gonna be dumb about it, they aren't going to re-write their own history for the sake of a game.
So while the game is not confirmed to be based on anything, the theories based off of what is in the books are far more viably, not to mention believable than many of the halfbaked theories that pop up. Theories and debates are fun, but when garbage that makes no sense within the established universe keeps flying around, it will get criticised.
[Edited on 06.26.2009 12:22 PM PDT]