Halo 3: ODST Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Do you think ODST is turning H3 into COD
  • Subject: Do you think ODST is turning H3 into COD
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Do you think ODST is turning H3 into COD

(;3=

no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4

  • 06.27.2009 2:15 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Josephson
no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4
Well, it's safe to say you have never played COD.

  • 06.27.2009 2:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Horse Repairman
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: Leos Blade
I have also said i never knew about the shields, that in mind my opinion may have changed a little. But i dont think there is massive difference between the two games now other than the jumps and shields?
How many shots does it take to kill you in COD? And In Halo? Shields/Stamina is a big deal. That's not the only difference. No aiming down the sights, no vehicles, no aliens and tougher foes then the rest, different guns, vastly different online gameplay and ranking, etc. etc.


No aiming down the sights? Do you know what aiming down the sights is? You're still aiming down the sights in Halo, it's just that you're ALWAYS aiming down the sights.
I mean visually, and the fact that it doesn't change your accuracy.

  • 06.27.2009 2:17 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Horse Repairman
No aiming down the sights? Do you know what aiming down the sights is? You're still aiming down the sights in Halo, it's just that you're ALWAYS aiming down the sights.

Wrong. You have a reticule, you're not aiming down the sights. Aiming down the sights mean placing the iron sight directly in front of your eye.

  • 06.27.2009 2:19 PM PDT

Posted by: Yes it Was

u have no life no money no girlfriend no land and no soul. u ra worthless ingornt mornic litle man. u are a detrimint to human sociaty and you ran emberesment to human kind. ur parents didn't love you and you where given up for adoption at birth, your adopted parens never told you because they feal srry for you. U are the lowest kind of human scum and you desirve to be shot.

go kill yourself and do the world a faver

No, and are you dumb?

  • 06.27.2009 2:19 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Horse Repairman
No aiming down the sights? Do you know what aiming down the sights is? You're still aiming down the sights in Halo, it's just that you're ALWAYS aiming down the sights.

Wrong. You have a reticule, you're not aiming down the sights. Aiming down the sights mean placing the iron sight directly in front of your eye.
He means that they are technically to get a shot off, just the animations don't show it.

  • 06.27.2009 2:20 PM PDT

(;3=

Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: Josephson
no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4
Well, it's safe to say you have never played COD.


no every -blam!- weapon was seriously overpowered the only cod i liked was WaW but mine broke which sux. lets just hope modern warfare 2 is better then the first (which wouldnt be that hard)

  • 06.27.2009 2:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Horse Repairman
No aiming down the sights? Do you know what aiming down the sights is? You're still aiming down the sights in Halo, it's just that you're ALWAYS aiming down the sights.

Wrong. You have a reticule, you're not aiming down the sights. Aiming down the sights mean placing the iron sight directly in front of your eye.
He means that they are technically to get a shot off, just the animations don't show it.

I see, but he's still wrong about aiming down the iron sight. You actually wouldn't need to since the visor has a reticule anyway.

  • 06.27.2009 2:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Josephson
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: Josephson
no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4
Well, it's safe to say you have never played COD.


no every -blam!- weapon was seriously overpowered the only cod i liked was WaW but mine broke which sux. lets just hope modern warfare 2 is better then the first (which wouldnt be that hard)
No, they weren't. Just takes less shots to kill in that game compared to others. Doesn't make the guns more powerful.

  • 06.27.2009 2:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Horse Repairman
No aiming down the sights? Do you know what aiming down the sights is? You're still aiming down the sights in Halo, it's just that you're ALWAYS aiming down the sights.

Wrong. You have a reticule, you're not aiming down the sights. Aiming down the sights mean placing the iron sight directly in front of your eye.
He means that they are technically to get a shot off, just the animations don't show it.

I see, but he's still wrong about aiming down the iron sight. You actually wouldn't need to since the visor has a reticule anyway.
Doesn't make the bullets more accurate. If the MC just held it at his hip and fired, or aimed through the sights, which do you think would be more accurate?

  • 06.27.2009 2:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Mass effect 3
Final Fantasy 13-2
The Elder Scrolls Skyrim

Posted by: Josephson
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: Josephson
no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4
Well, it's safe to say you have never played COD.


no every -blam!- weapon was seriously overpowered the only cod i liked was WaW but mine broke which sux. lets just hope modern warfare 2 is better then the first (which wouldnt be that hard)


Sure i think most people can't handle cod because it's a paced game.

  • 06.27.2009 2:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Argumentum ad populum

No, changing how the game plays is not trying to copy CoD, it's trying to be innovative.

Popular to contrary belief not every game wants or has to be like CoD to be good.

  • 06.27.2009 2:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Deleted
Doesn't make the bullets more accurate. If the MC just held it at his hip and fired, or aimed through the sights, which do you think would be more accurate?

It's as if you forgot my previous posts.

  • 06.27.2009 2:27 PM PDT

(;3=

Posted by: Mr Shock Trooper
Posted by: Josephson
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: Josephson
no because halo isnt a one hit kill with every weapon like cod 4
Well, it's safe to say you have never played COD.


no every -blam!- weapon was seriously overpowered the only cod i liked was WaW but mine broke which sux. lets just hope modern warfare 2 is better then the first (which wouldnt be that hard)


Sure i think most people can't handle cod because it's a paced game.


it is just to easy to kill and rarely the person you are shooting at has a chance to fight back.

  • 06.27.2009 2:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Doesn't make the bullets more accurate. If the MC just held it at his hip and fired, or aimed through the sights, which do you think would be more accurate?

It's as if you forgot my previous posts.
That is to help with aiming. Aiming down the sights helps with aiming, but it also steadies your grip and makes you a more acccurate shooter. It doesn't matter if he has a reticule or not, it won't change physics.

  • 06.27.2009 2:30 PM PDT

They aren't Super Soldiers, and put it this way...

It's just like having a shield, but once that "Shield" goes down, you die.

Plus, we cannot sprint...

  • 06.27.2009 2:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Doesn't make the bullets more accurate. If the MC just held it at his hip and fired, or aimed through the sights, which do you think would be more accurate?

It's as if you forgot my previous posts.
That is to help with aiming. Aiming down the sights helps with aiming, but it also steadies your grip and makes you a more acccurate shooter. It doesn't matter if he has a reticule or not, it won't change physics.

No kidding. I said they don't need to aim down their sights, I didn't say it would still be as accurate. Firing without aiming down the iron sight still hits the target, but it's not as accurate, which I already know.

  • 06.27.2009 2:32 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Doesn't make the bullets more accurate. If the MC just held it at his hip and fired, or aimed through the sights, which do you think would be more accurate?

It's as if you forgot my previous posts.
That is to help with aiming. Aiming down the sights helps with aiming, but it also steadies your grip and makes you a more acccurate shooter. It doesn't matter if he has a reticule or not, it won't change physics.

No kidding. I said they don't need to aim down their sights, I didn't say it would still be as accurate. Firing without aiming down the iron sight still hits the target, but it's not as accurate, which I already know.
No kidding. I know, I'm just saying that's why they would do it.

[Edited on 06.27.2009 2:34 PM PDT]

  • 06.27.2009 2:34 PM PDT

PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME GROUP INVITATIONS

The Halo REACH Script (post thoughts in thread)

Writing Lead of Whisper Studios. Check out Heron!

Look... I'm on bungiepedia!

Posted by: PotatoMunchi
no shields make it like cod?
Except you still have the shield level (called "stamina" in ODST).

  • 06.27.2009 2:35 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Skanty
  • user homepage:

OP: Cod ha regenerating health. Thats more like original Halo 3 than ODST.

  • 06.27.2009 2:35 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Deleted
No kidding. I know, I'm just saying that's why they would do it.

Okay then.

  • 06.27.2009 2:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
No kidding. I know, I'm just saying that's why they would do it.

Okay then.
Happy ending for both parties?

  • 06.27.2009 2:39 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
No kidding. I know, I'm just saying that's why they would do it.

Okay then.
Happy ending for both parties?

Indeed.

  • 06.27.2009 2:41 PM PDT

"Apparently people don't like the truth, but I do like it; I like it because it upsets a lot of people. If you show them enough times that their arguments are bull-blam!-, then maybe just once, one of them will say, 'Oh! Wait a minute I was wrong.' I live for that happening. Rare, I assure you."-Lemmy of Motorhead

i belive shhave funzes suppos

Yes, I'm the guy who had the Flood admit to being furries.

Posted by: Leos Blade
I think that playing with out shields is in effect turning H3 into COD in a halo setting.
Not that i am complaining as i enjoy both games. What do you guys think?
You are an idiot. No shields doesn't mean Call of Duty. It's as if you think COD is the only game without shields.

  • 06.27.2009 2:42 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
Posted by: City Static
Posted by: Deleted
No kidding. I know, I'm just saying that's why they would do it.

Okay then.
Happy ending for both parties?

Indeed.
*Dances*

Anyways, I'm not gonna distrupt the topic at hand anymore. Proceed.

  • 06.27.2009 2:42 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3