Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Bungie!! Read This!: Game play, weapon, equipment, and vehicle ideas
  • Subject: Bungie!! Read This!: Game play, weapon, equipment, and vehicle ideas
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Bungie!! Read This!: Game play, weapon, equipment, and vehicle ideas

Ugh...

First on a BWU.. yeah, I'm cool.

ODST;MYTHIC Screenshot winner! One of the first to get their hands on the mythic map pack.

Posted by: UNSC Spartan360
Why does everyone think attachments make weapons better? They just make it better for closer or longer range, or give it less power but higher rate of fire.
I'm not saying they make the weapon better, I'm saying if one player has this option, and another player doesn't have it. Then no, this should not happen.

  • 06.29.2009 5:00 PM PDT

sebastian

um this is halo not call of duty so no i dun think so.

  • 06.29.2009 5:03 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

But that's like saying if one person has a shot gun and another has a b.r.........Then people shouldn't have different weapons? I must be misunderstanding you. Wait!,do you mean if one player has a weapon that just doesn't have a attachment to go with it and another player does? Oh?, then maybe attachments shouldn't come with the weapons they're for. Is that what you mean? Then it would still be Halo style. You would fight for weapons, and their attachments. There could be a maximum of 2 attachment types for some or even all weapons, and you could carry one attachment at a time.





[Edited on 06.30.2009 3:16 PM PDT]

  • 06.29.2009 5:09 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!! Read This!: Game play, weapon, equipment, and vehicle ideas

G-R-A-Y-M-8-8

Pronounced, Gray Em Eighty Eight

Happens in the books, so its very "Halo-Like" and I endorse it.

  • 06.29.2009 5:15 PM PDT

How to spell "space"?

S-P-ACE! SPACE!

Rifle frag+BR=MLG's noob combo.

  • 06.29.2009 5:16 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss
  • gamertag: F0r3s7
  • user homepage:

Spartan WIll Had a Fist Fight With a Hunter...And Won

LEAVE HALO ALONE!!! Its fine how it is.We dont need Sprint or attatchments. It would just ruin gameplay.HALO IS MEANT TO BE SIMPLE. Thats what makes it fun.

  • 06.30.2009 1:13 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

It wouldn't change it that much. Attachments would just be treated like weapons or equipment. And there are people that agree with my idea.

  • 06.30.2009 1:23 PM PDT
Subject: Halo Reach: Weapon, Equipmet, and Vehicle Ideas 2

What spectagon are you in?

You mean like COD............ no.

  • 06.30.2009 1:26 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

Posted by: Sir Muffinator
You mean like COD............ no.


........Attachments are basically equipment for weapons. You treat them like equipment what's the big deal.


[Edited on 06.30.2009 1:52 PM PDT]

  • 06.30.2009 1:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

Hey guys sorry if you found this through one of my links Im sorry, and I just really wanted to know what you thought. Im knew to bungie.net and this is actually my first time posting my ideas on a website.




[Edited on 06.30.2009 3:17 PM PDT]

  • 06.30.2009 2:09 PM PDT
Subject: Halo Reach: Game play, weapon, equipment, and vehicle ideas

93% of statistics are lies. Formerly Xfire Grunt. Unfortunately, you can't change the WLID for your BNET account, so I had to create an alternate account. My other WLID was spam city (and it was my e-mail account too).

Posted by: SK CRISIS
Halo's been fine with the simple weapon system it's had for years, I don't think it needs to be changed.


That weapon system is 8 years old now. I think it could get some upgrades. COD 4 got some massive upgrades over COD 2, and that resulted in a massive sales increase + fun increase.

  • 06.30.2009 2:16 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

State a reason why you disagree and the same for if you agree please. I mean the people who say things like "this isn't COD". I know Halo doesn't need attachments. Well it doesn't need equipment or vehicles either, but you want them right!? It's just an idea I thought would be cool.

[Edited on 06.30.2009 5:58 PM PDT]

  • 06.30.2009 3:42 PM PDT

Power corrupts. Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.

LOL This is either the idea you love or you hate. I personally think that anything but a grenade launcher would be useless though considering that in the halo series you were never allowed to use your guns iron sights and so anything like red dot sight or something along those lines wouldnt work. a gun camo would be cool though.

  • 07.01.2009 8:16 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

No "this isn't COD" please.

  • 07.09.2009 1:29 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

No "this isn't COD" please.

  • 07.09.2009 1:29 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

(-_-) Bored Face

Sorry for the double post.

  • 07.09.2009 1:30 AM PDT

Posted by: XxJakeMasterxX
Why don't people understand love
:CCCCCCCCCCC

Attachments would be a nice thing to spice up the gameplay! In Halo 3 MOST battles ussually fall into two catergories, Shoot your enemy from afar(ussually the first to shoot is gunna win) and charge at your enemy shooting then quickly follow uo with a punch, and frankly it starts to get a little dull. Which is excatly why weapon customisation is a great idea, i like my AR but I ussually use the BR because it is just much more effective. So weapon attachments to increase damage, accuracy, reload time, rate of fire and a few attachments unique to specific weapons would be awesome!!!

  • 07.09.2009 4:25 AM PDT
Subject: Halo Reach: Weapon, Equipmet, and Vehicle Ideas 2
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

i think its because there are only a few noob weapons per map these guys want to sign in and get 20 kills and never die they should stick to COD

  • 07.09.2009 4:37 AM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

GUYS i think we shouldnt add anything that changes anything because then it would be unfair to stupid blam!s that dont know how to press A to add something to their weapons and while were at it lets take every weapon and equipment out because maybe someone forgots where they are so thats unfair to them because then it will be like everyone having super h4x except for you cause your a blaming blam.
And lets also get rid of armor and just run around with mark IV for everyone because it will be unfair that good people get rewards to make them look cool or to specialize there weapons instead of make them uberwtfbbq weapons like people think atachments will do.
YAY!!!11!!one!!eleven11!!

  • 08.21.2009 2:15 PM PDT
Subject: Bungie!ReadThis:gameplay, weapon,equipment, vehicle ideas:discuss

Posted by: UNSC Spartan360
I think active camo and over shields should be made into equipment. You would press (x) to activate active camo or over shield(s). Active camo would last for 45 seconds then you have to wait a minute and a half for them to charge.The over shield(s) would take damage and recharge a little faster than normal until 180 seconds is up.Then you have to wait 2 miutes.I like the exoskeleton idea.


This would make halo nearly impossible, there would be people who come in invisable grab the flag and then if someone shoots at them activates overshields to insure that the flag is in a vehicle or captured. But i do wish you could have active camo like in halo 2 campaign where it lasts like 10 seconds

  • 08.21.2009 3:05 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

If they're a equals then they make no difference. The carbine is like your description of one of the BR alternatives and the other sounds like a BR. What's the point then? Why not just have different weapons instead of being able to change one weapon into another? It would just be a gimmicky feature to clog the game up with more nonsense. Halo in no way needs it and wouldn't benefit from weapon attachments at all.

  • 08.21.2009 3:46 PM PDT

No surrender!

Customizable guns? No thanks, because that would mean custom classes, which means perks, which means, oh wait! Call of halo

[Edited on 08.21.2009 3:52 PM PDT]

  • 08.21.2009 3:52 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2