- P3P5I
- |
- Intrepid Mythic Member
- gamertag: P3P5I
- user homepage:
Posted by: Achronos
It isn't our shiznit anymore.
Posted by: CivilTugBoat
People that are pro-natal seem to only focus on one aspect of a FPS, and that's, well, the shooting. They, at first, forget about walking, melee, walking, grenades, walking, the simple action of looking around (IE look behind you), and did I mention walking? Reach better not be some Arcade shooter, which, if there is an Arcade shooter in the 360's future, then yes, NATAL would be perfect. BUT a NATAL only Reach will be a terrible HALO game.
/hopefullyendofcomplainingaboutNATALonHaloReachbutIdoubtit;)
Alright I'll take a look at this.
Walking (that's a big issue as I can see) - Have a fixed point on the floor that your camera targets. When you stand on it, your player is still. But when you move toward the camera, your player starts to move forward, and then move faster depending on how close you are to the camera, and vice versa for going backwards.
Turning (specifically looking behind you) - Small movements translated to larger movements on the game. Have yourself turn 30 degrees and the player will turn continuously until you face forward again.
Melee - I guess you would punch.
Grenade - throwing motion.
Theoretically, it's a good idea to incorporate natal into Reach but since the beta is coming out November I doubt they can implement it into the game in time, maybe the next game.