Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [14 votes]: You like this idea?
  • Poll [14 votes]: You like this idea?
Subject: More players in the multiplayer of Halo: Reach!!
  • gamertag: kulco
  • user homepage:

Poll: You like this idea?  [closed]
Yes!:  79%
(11 Votes)
No...:  21%
(3 Votes)
Total Votes: 14

Both Halo 2 and Halo 3, the maximum supported players in a multiplayer game online, has 16 players at once.
Now, my proposal is:
Why not increase that maximum number of players?
I would love to play games with my friends up to 32 or more players, it is difficult, but I would take it into account in the next game.
Friends of Bungie and Halo community:
What do you think?

kulco

[Edited on 07.03.2009 8:47 PM PDT]

  • 07.03.2009 8:45 PM PDT

Ugh...

First on a BWU.. yeah, I'm cool.

ODST;MYTHIC Screenshot winner! One of the first to get their hands on the mythic map pack.

This has been suggested before. Aslong as the lag can be controlled and minimized, I am for it. But that is unlikely, so no.

  • 07.03.2009 8:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

32 would be the maximum payer count I would want to see in a Halo game.

  • 07.03.2009 8:50 PM PDT

Oh yeah It's Rayzed.

The lag would be devastating unless they do an almost anti-Halo . They would have to shut down Halo2 multiplayer. This is crazy I know. But shutting down Halo2's multiplayer would effectively cut back on lag. Bungie uses dedicated servers for their games. Servers that both Halo3 and Halo2 run off of. You delete one and it smoothes things for the other.

  • 07.03.2009 8:56 PM PDT

24 players maybe?

  • 07.03.2009 9:07 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Posted by: Raylette
The lag would be devastating unless they do an almost anti-Halo . They would have to shut down Halo2 multiplayer. This is crazy I know. But shutting down Halo2's multiplayer would effectively cut back on lag. Bungie uses dedicated servers for their games. Servers that both Halo3 and Halo2 run off of. You delete one and it smoothes things for the other.
Okay, that's wrong in like three different ways. I could correct it, but it's just too funny.

  • 07.03.2009 9:17 PM PDT

/">

Posted by: Juan Teran
24 players maybe?
Yes, and not MM.

That'd be good.

  • 07.03.2009 9:17 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I have one question to everybody why is it that the PS3 can support lots of players in their games with minimal lag but the 360 can't.

  • 07.03.2009 9:37 PM PDT

I will find you doctor phil and i will destroy you

Frontlines Fuel of War is able to host 50 players with excelent graphics and little lag.

  • 07.03.2009 9:50 PM PDT