- Runic Aries
- |
- Noble Member
Posted by: BULLETxSP0NGE
Posted by: Runic Aries
Posted by: BULLETxSP0NGE
Why do we need overpowered anti-vehicle weapons to kill a vehicle? Why not just allow team work and grenades to potentially kill a vehicle. The Rocket Launcher is much more fair when it comes to taking out vehicles, you actually have to aim.
Alright then, lets play a 4v4 on standoff, you cant use the rockets, or the laser, sound fun? Exactly, no.
That doesn't even make sense. Maybe you should have a response that actually applies to my statement. I never said there was something wrong with the Rockets.
It actually does, you were complaining that instead of having anti vehicle weapons like the laser, it should take teamwork to bring a warthog down, as i recall, rockets are an anti vehicle weapon.
Posted by: Josh 22 T
Posted by: Runic Aries
Posted by: Josh 22 T
If the Spartan Laser is in Reach, I think that removing the 2x scope would be good enough. It makes it harder to hit vehicles and people at longer ranges. Yes, the Laser still has the same range, but it's harder to use at longer ranges. Other than removing the scope, I think that the Laser is fine.
you never played with the Halo 3 beta laser did you?
No, I haven't. Why do you ask? The Laser had a scope then.
My post actually has some fail wording in it. I don't think that the Laser needs changing, but if any changes are made, then that's the change I'd like to see. Time to go edit my post.
The halo 3 beta laser's scope was much more accurate than it was now, currently its one small dot in the middle of a big circle, before it was like BR and sniper cross hairs.