- Chunky_Lover
- |
- Fabled Mythic Member
Posted by: MLG Cheehwawa
Posted by: Chunky_Lover
Cool thought, but I disagree.
Whats the incentive to me playing this? Why would I want a copy of Battlefield....when I can just play Battlefield?
Why not have its own original gameplay? Why does it have to be completely adopted from another?It would not be completely copied. The gameplay from Halo (shields, running, melee, controls, etc.) would all be virtually identical to the classic trilogy, but with more depth (i.e. vehicle weak points, which do not exist in BF, but do exist in one case in Halo 2, all weapons being versatile like in H1, etc.), just in a scaled up environment with more players, classes, and more order when it comes to large matches (parties talk to eachother, party leaders can talk to other party leaders by pressing the Dpad, so not too many people are talking at once)But it still resembles it.....a lot. Why not just take the BF aspect out of it? and still have large scale battles, bigger maps, capacity for more players etc .
Take out classes and such and keep in the Halo and take out the BF.
Thats just my opinion on this.
[Edited on 07.27.2009 10:00 AM PDT]