- JaketheSnake 76
- |
- Exalted Heroic Member
People who report others on the bungie forums are so cool!
Posted by: Preliator
Posted by: JaketheSnake 76
Posted by: ArchedThunder
Posted by: a flying jar
Posted by: ArchedThunder
A GAME DOESN'T NEED MULTIPLAYER TO BE WORTH 60 DOLLARS.
Assassin's Creed, anyone?
or Bioshock
Bioshock was about 8 hours long with no Coop or multiplayer, yet every one was like "OMG THIZ AER LIEK TEH GRATEST GAEM EVAR U HAZ TO BY IT, WORTH EVARE PENNEH" but ODST is confirmed to be around that length or longer, with 4 player Coop and Firefight mode, yet people don't think its worth $60, wtf?
To compare Bioshock's single player campaign to ANY Halo campaign besides Halo: CE is silly.
And Bioshock was much longer than 8 hours.
IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAME, ESPECIALLY WITHIN 8 MONTHS, A DEVELOPER DOESN'T DECIDE TO JUST ADD 4 HOURS TO A CAMPAIGN.
I did the math. It's worth no more than 45 dollars.
Wait, wait...When was the Game Informer interview done? If someone answers this for me, my mind might be changed.
I don't remember when the interview was done but it was a while back. If you actualy sit and do the math it does come out to more than $60 because there are alot of games that have a shorter campaign and no extra content that sell for $60. You get, and this is not including everything everyone else already has, a new campaign(that's longer than what most people think it will be) firefight, and 3 new maps.
Its roughly $70 not including the reach beta plus the halo 3 mm and every map that has been made for the game.
My math is superior.
Could you just tell me if the interview was done before or after december, and if it was before, then how long before?