Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: idea for matchmaking.
  • Subject: idea for matchmaking.
Subject: idea for matchmaking.

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

dont you hate trying to find a game of team slayer or something, when there is a team of 3 of you, then you get teamed up with a scrub, or team killer ect. i think there should be an option for you to select team slayer 3v3. this way you can connect to game faster so you dont need to find another player, and you wont get all in a hissyfit, because of some random teammate stealing the sniper then climbs onto a warthog turret.

post more ideas for Reach match making.

  • 07.28.2009 5:53 PM PDT

Halo 2 felt like it had a better MM system than Halo 3. If you were in a team of three and another team of three popped up they would put you in the game.

  • 07.28.2009 5:57 PM PDT

You are lame...

or you could just get another person to join your party
/thread

[Edited on 07.28.2009 5:58 PM PDT]

  • 07.28.2009 5:57 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

but what if you dont. what if you are a team of 3, and you dont want some random team mate joining (and you WANT to stay as a 3), then you should have the option to to find a 3v3 game.

  • 07.28.2009 5:58 PM PDT

You are lame...

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
but what if you dont. what if you are a team of 3, and you dont want some random team mate joining (and you WANT to stay as a 3), then you should have the option to to find a 3v3 game.
with that logic you should have the ability to play 1v1, 2v2....16v16. This won't happen though because it would be a waste of Bungie's server power.

  • 07.28.2009 6:01 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

well im sure with a fresh new game, a fresh new engine, im pretty sure there going to do up there servers.

  • 07.28.2009 6:03 PM PDT

You are lame...

It is just not logical to have that many playlists though because then the MM experience as a whole would be degraded. The playlists populations would be more stretched out and the searches would be slowed down. Sometimes less IS more.

  • 07.28.2009 6:06 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

if anything it would speed up searches. think about it, you trying to find players to start the game and your in a team of 3. then you find 3 more players, *BOOM* you have a game right there...but oooh no! you find someone else...waiting for one more player. you wait. and wait. and wait. Oh restarting search.

so you just waisted about 2-3 mins trying to find a game that you didnt even play, when you could have matched them same 3 players in the 3v3 setting and got on with the game.

  • 07.28.2009 6:11 PM PDT

instead of making 3v3 its own playlist why not have a search option for similar party sizes

  • 07.28.2009 6:36 PM PDT

BOOM DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It would be cool if there was a mix of infection and campaign. All players would start as their spartan or elite with an smg and a combat knife. About 10-15 seconds into the game 1 player would be sent back to the starting area as a flood and would use his/her whip arm to infect humans. The humans would be infected without dying and everyone has 1 life. Bullets and knives could push zombies back but it should take 700,000,000,000 shots from an smg to kill a zombie. There should be goals to activate certain things(such as when a player reaches a goal a message appears on the screen saying door opens in 20 seconds then it does, mine cart leaving in 45 seconds then it does, or pelican arriving 70 seconds then it does. There should be no time limit and it should be called pandemic run. Zombies also went 3.5 times faster than humans and it would take 1 hit to infect a human (but they would have be within a 3ft radius to infect).

  • 07.28.2009 6:39 PM PDT