- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Spartaman 117
Posted by: McDullty
Posted by: Spartaman 117
Posted by: McDullty
How bout this. Instead of changing Halo, lets change Call of Duty, Gears of War, and Battlefield. Call of Duty can have static crosshairs and energy shields. Gears of War can be first person and have dual-wielding. Battlefield can be a fast-paced, close quarters, run and gun Quake clone. How 'bout that? 'Cuz change is good right?
Alright!
i hear your sarcasm
but change is good!
try it for like one game in the series
if it sucks dont go back
if its awesome make like everyother game in that style
think about cod
the first 3 were wwii\
fourth was modern and that was a HUGE change
and it worked out great!
Except that's a change of scenery, not a change of gameplay.
i beg to differ
modern combat is incomparible to combat 60 years ago
the entire multiplayer system was rethought
its not a huge change
but small changes are all we need
like wouldnt it be great to veto a map before it loads in halo
or to join/ leave a match part way through?
you cant say all changes are bad
itd b very hard to back up that statement
Of course small changes would be good. Small additions and improvements, but not a complete redesign. And certainly not adding in really generic things from every other shooter on the planet like accuracy getting worse when you walk, or gun jamming, and crap like that.
Small changes isn't what this thread is about though, so I don't understand your point.