- ramenloverninja
- |
- Noble Member
Voilà!In view,a humble vaudevillian veteran,cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate.This visage, no mere veneer of vanity,is a vestige of the vox populi,now vacant, vanished.However,this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation,stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin van-guarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.
Posted by: I UnSe3N I
Posted by: The EAKLE
Posted by: I UnSe3N I
There are three problems with this thread. The first is that it is a duplicate of another thread (against the rules). The second is that because you are talking about specifically the BR this should go into the only BR thread on the Halo 3 forum. So now that I have shown you that you have clearly broken forum rules I will proceed to tell you my third reason why there is a problem with your idea. I asked a Ninja to lock the old one so i could post the new one. If a Ninja allows it, i don thin kit's against the rules. Also, it is not a duplicate, it is entirely different although the purpose is the same.
This is about Halo: Reach, not Halo 3. Why post it in the Halo 3 forum? Again, if a ninja allowed this i doubt it is breaking rules.
Making a suggestion is selfish? Wouldnt that make your suggestion selfish too, because you are asking for more? No, a suggestion is not selfish. If i said "The BR is stupid and bad, remove it" I would be selfish. Im just suggesting what i think will make the game better.
My suggestions are not selfish because I am promoting more for everyone not an individual point of view. Yes, you are pretty much saying that the BR is stupid and bad. The only difference is that you attempt to use arguments to support this notion instead of saying it outright. What you think will make the game better is not what everyone thinks will make the game better thats why your idea is flawed.
I don't understand why you are being so selfish and not thinking of the Big picture. There are people who like the BR. No matter how much you think that it hurts your idea of what gameplay should be like this will always be true. Bungie knows that there are people that enjoy the BR and I doubt they would ever remove it. They will likely just implement more settings so that everyone is happy. More options broadens a games audience and creates more sales. Its common sense. Also if the BR is removed what will the anti sniper weapon be? Next I suppose you will want the sniper to be removed on the grounds that nothing can compete with it at long range. So it encourages camping etc.
That almost makes me think you didnt read the OP. The point is not removing the BR, it is re-balancing it. That may involve replacing it with another weapon. However, all the weapon sets i suggested have a mid range weapon, which would fill this gap you are talking about.
The statement in Bold is in direct contradiction. If you replace the BR with another weapon is it not removed?
I am not promoting only more options for competitive type settings I am advocating more settings for every style of play. This would make the game more accessible for any interest or idea of what gameplay should be (ex) griftball, zombies, rocket race, MLG, swatt. All of those gametypes are a spawn of Bungie giving more options to players thus promoting a wider fan base and equality. Your ideas are in direct contradiction of this. You make it sound like i am trying to ruin Halo. Everyone can have his own ideas on what should happen. Im not trying to put down yours, so why try to put down mine?
I am just stating that what you advocate would impose your idea of what gameplay should be like on everyone. Not ever person agrees on how Halo should be played so therein lies the problem with imposing one type of gameplay on everyone. That is why simply giving players the freedom to play as they see fit is a better solution to this dilemma.
What you say you advocate, and what he says he advocates are simply parallel
While you say we should get custom options to suit our gameplay needs
He says that if you wish to use your BR for long mid range combat you may but if someone wishes to use their AR against your BR in mid range them should be able to fight on equal footing as you
He is not forcing on type of gameplay on anyone, He is simply suggesting that in a certain range most of the weapons should come together on equal footing, promoting every type of gameplay at once