- xXDarkCrimsonXx
- |
- Noble Heroic Member
I am of an open mind and I am willing to hear criticism. Also: That's stupid and you're stupid.
Posted by: MLG Cheehwawa
Posted by: xXDarkCrimsonXx
Posted by: MLG Cheehwawa
Posted by: Rugged Musician
Posted by: purew4rrior
This is just a simple thread meant to get bungie's attention (although its probably not going to work lol) and not a thread for flaming of others opinions.
As you probably know the biggest question for Halo: Reach seems to be "Should there be classes in Halo: Reach". And I think at this time bungie should confirm or deny if there are classes so that the forums will stop being spammed by stupid questions. My opinion? No classes would not work for halo. But apparently others disagree so i think it should be answered.
I thought i would let you know that you are out of your mind. And This is NOT a Battlefield game this is HALO If he was suggesting classes for Halo 2 and Halo 3 I would see where you're coming from. But who says REACH won't be a new type of FPS?
You really do want a completely revamped Halo game, don't you?
As the old saying goes, "Don't change what is not broken." Halo's overall game play is just fine. It just needs tweaking with certain issues that have been addressed many times.I don't want a revamped Halo game, I want a new genre of Halo game built from the ground up (like Halo Wars). But thats only if the "classic" Halo gameplay would be butchered again like it was in Halo 2 and 3.
That's exactly why they can't build up a new Halo from the ground up. At least not with Reach, being Bungie's supposedly last Halo game.
Halo 3 has a high quality multiplayer that has replayability, making it the top played Xbox 360 game for 2 years running. The only option, at least that I can see being logical, is if they keep it similar to Halo 3, because it is not "broken."
A new, built from the ground up, Halo, would have to be done by another company, or by Bungie after Reach. If they do decide to make a new Halo again.