Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Should Bungie add customizable enemies in the forge of Halo: Reach?
  • Subject: Should Bungie add customizable enemies in the forge of Halo: Reach?
Subject: Should Bungie add customizable enemies in the forge of Halo: Reach?
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Iam enjoying Halo Reach and revisiting some past Bungie games, iam a big fan of Bungie and their online community.

That would be cool, you could make a fortress and then stage a survival game, like firefight.

  • 08.07.2009 1:49 PM PDT

Posted by: Darkjigglypuff
Let's just cut out the middle man and make Halo Gmod.


Why do people never seem to read the thread and just post on the title?

Darkjigglypuff, I assume you play Halo and like it. I know this because you are posting on the Halo: Reach forums on Bungie.net. Are you saying if this is included it would be 100% negative to Halo gameplay, even though it is completely up to you if you participate in such content and it doesnt have to be on MM?

No one is looking to mod Halo, just suggest ideas that could improve it.

  • 08.07.2009 6:03 PM PDT

This seems to complicated to the average player...BUT......I think i have a a solution.

How about this:

Total AI limit:10

Sparten: 10

Grunt : 5

Elite: 10

Marine: 7

Jackal: 7

Drone: 5

Hunter: 20

ODST: 8

Brute: 10

Prophet: 30 (limit 1)
----------------------------------

Now, you would get 3 options:

Engagement area:

Large

Medium

Small

------------------------------
Now more options...

Team:
Attacker
Defender
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The AI would have default weapons (.I.E. Sparten=Assualt Rifle)
and would engage enemy team when he/she enters engagement zone.

  • 08.07.2009 7:26 PM PDT

Deweycook ... you beat me too it. lol

I was actually about to update my thread with alot of those same ideas.

Thanks for the input, it is much appreciated.

  • 08.08.2009 9:00 AM PDT

no bots! in gears of war 2 bots suck u cant play on live so i dont want halo to be that way!

  • 08.08.2009 9:56 AM PDT

Definitaly agree with this thread I've had similar ideas to this myself.

You could have this: AI magnetism (my name for it): This is basically where you highlight a particular object like an oddball or a player and all the enemies go for it, this might be how you make your own basic firefight maps.

Forge needs more complicated options to make better maps.

I might post my idea of a trigger system which ties in with AI quite a lot.

[Edited on 08.08.2009 10:17 AM PDT]

  • 08.08.2009 10:17 AM PDT

"If you push this button. Someone. Somewhere will die.

BUT.

You will, hey wait! Didn't you wanna hear what you'd get first!"

You forgot no respawn option.

  • 08.08.2009 10:20 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Why people need a Campaign Forge? WtF?? nobody need this...
Get a job at Bungie as an Level Designer and u can create ur Levels with Ai and so...
Halo is not a game that need an Editor like the CryEngine 2 Sandbox 2 (i love this editor).
Forge is not Forge when u got no Limits. Dont forget the Xbox 360 resources ...

Stop that stupid idea...oh my god

  • 08.08.2009 10:30 AM PDT

"If you push this button. Someone. Somewhere will die.

BUT.

You will, hey wait! Didn't you wanna hear what you'd get first!"

Posted by: halo2jumper
Why people need a Campaign Forge? WtF?? nobody need this...
Get a job at Bungie as an Level Designer and u can create ur Levels with Ai and so...
Halo is not a game that need an Editor like the CryEngine 2 Sandbox 2 (i love this editor).
Forge is not Forge when u got no Limits. Dont forget the Xbox 360 resources ...

Stop that stupid idea...oh my god


Stupid idea? Seriously? And btw, more people would enjoy this than bungie could higher anyway. So your idea is out of the option. Halo does need an editor. In my opinion it helps the game last so long. Quite frankly, I think your opinion is completely unproofed. How come it doesn't need an editor.

Point is, having the option to add AI allows for plenty of new online and single player possibilities. I would rather have it than not.

  • 08.08.2009 10:47 AM PDT

Posted by: skull56546
no bots! in gears of war 2 bots suck u cant play on live so i dont want halo to be that way!


Once again, please read the thread and previous posts before posting yourself.

NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT BOTS!

What I am suggesting is an A.I. that is completely player set and completely optional if you use!

And even if Bungie was making bots, it would be GREAT. If Bungie was able to make bots for player made content, they would have revolutionized the world of online gameplay.

Do not shout at what you can not (or refuse to) understand.

  • 08.08.2009 12:32 PM PDT

Posted by: BeyondMortality
Posted by: Radishhhh
4 europeans, an american and a japanese person in a game


I was totally expecting a joke out of that.

I'm all for the idea, It's just that a Halo version of Half-Lifes GMOD would be sick as hell.

  • 08.08.2009 10:29 PM PDT

Posted by: Darkjigglypuff
I'm all for the idea, It's just that a Halo version of Half-Lifes GMOD would be sick as hell.


I fail to see the comparison, but thanks for the support.

  • 08.09.2009 8:09 AM PDT

Hey, I play games.

He is not saying that it can handle any situation, but even if he was I am just confirming it is possible because you can do this in any halo game with trainers. Trainers are a mod where you can people create AI's to play for them and these can actually handle almost any situation. These AI's take up alot of memory though, but they could definitely make a smaller and dumber version.
By the way, I have never used one of these with my account and do not have any on my xbox, though I have seen them first hand, I am just announcing this so I am not banned...bungie.

  • 08.09.2009 8:41 AM PDT

Hey, I play games.

I don't think you realise how much resources the xbox 360 actually has(over 20g of ram)

  • 08.09.2009 8:44 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Believe

My gametag is not sparda34b, it was an error, gamertag is Sparda3b.

I think this would be really cool, I am afraid of the very possible lag but i think it should be put in.

  • 08.09.2009 9:27 AM PDT

Snakie Purple.

"Hamdog, Hamdog, Hamdog, Hamdog"-Hamdog.

Twatter

No.

Then it's not multiplayer. It's Player vs. Bots.

  • 08.09.2009 9:28 AM PDT

Posted by: Arbiduck
No.

Then it's not multiplayer. It's Player vs. Bots.


1. What is wrong with player vs. bot.

2. If you think players would only use bots and never form groups because of this ... see a doctor.

3. It is an optional addition on to customs/forge. No one ever said anything about MM.

  • 08.09.2009 9:41 AM PDT

Remember to post your response.

  • 08.09.2009 12:18 PM PDT

I want you to die a slow painful death.

it's been done before, Bots have been in games like Unreal Tournament, and Counter Strike.

however, I would like to see them in the next halo.

  • 08.09.2009 1:56 PM PDT

Posted by: Soldier Anubis
it's been done before, Bots have been in games like Unreal Tournament, and Counter Strike.

however, I would like to see them in the next halo.


Yes, but remeber, could a bot function on a map made ENTIRELY by a player? I am not expecting anything THAT inovative, but it would be a GREAT surprise.

  • 08.09.2009 2:02 PM PDT

Anyone who says yes has no idea how this would ruin gameplay.

  • 08.09.2009 2:07 PM PDT

Posted by: Runic Aries
Anyone who says yes has no idea how this would ruin gameplay.


1. You provided no opinion other than "no."

2. You provided no proof.

3. It is completely optional if you use it.

  • 08.09.2009 2:17 PM PDT

If anyone has any constructive critisizm it would be helpful. I dont mind people disagreeing with me, as long as they have a logical reason.

  • 08.09.2009 6:14 PM PDT

"If you push this button. Someone. Somewhere will die.

BUT.

You will, hey wait! Didn't you wanna hear what you'd get first!"

I think that the only problem with this is that people will start whining about how their map is the best and all, which we already have. So nothing new really. I can't see how this would backfire.

EDIT: Oh and why don't you add a no respawn option for respawn times, as we have in Halo 3.

[Edited on 08.09.2009 6:18 PM PDT]

  • 08.09.2009 6:17 PM PDT

Posted by: redearth
I think that the only problem with this is that people will start whining about how their map is the best and all, which we already have. So nothing new really. I can't see how this would backfire.

EDIT: Oh and why don't you add a no respawn option for respawn times, as we have in Halo 3.


Yes, there will always be some of that. Also, thanks for pointing out the mistake.

  • 08.10.2009 11:08 AM PDT