- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
"Carbine is generally better than the BR at close range due to faster rate of fire"
They are nearly the same. Carbine is slightly faster firing, but that's it.
"BR is generally better than the Carbine at long range due to easier headshots"
The BR is Slightly better due to slightly better accuracy.
My point is, why have these slight changes in the weapons? They are both just as good as each other, although you might argue one is slightly better is close range, one is slightly better at long range, but its not worth adding a whole new weapon. Its like COD, almost every assault rifle is the same, with minor changes in the accuracy and damage.
Adding a single shot option to the BR wouldn't make it unbalanced, its not going to change the damage or anything, its just going to give the player an option of increasing the accuracy at the price of not being able to fire as fast as a 3-burst mode. Tell me: Whats so unbalanced about that? hmm?
You are confusing my idea with the difference of weapons.
"if you can't see that your'e an idiot. "
Please don't flame.
" they do the same job but in a different manner"
And? I think the beam rifle is useless. Once again, my point of tiny little changes in weapons applies.
"The AR and Plasma Rifle do the same job"
That is different. The plasma rifle is good at shredding shields quickly, while the AR is good at shredding armour quickly. Vise versa, the plasme rifle SUCKS at taking out armour.
However, with the carbine and BR, they have no "shield/armour" advantages, as they are both the same in terms of this. see?
The rest of you're points are silly, the carbine and BR are very similar. This point does not apply to grenades or plasma rifle, or the sword/shot gun.