- Demache
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
"Rise and shine Mister Freeman. Rise and----shine." -Gman
Posted by: redearth
Posted by: Hypogonadism
Posted by: redearth
Posted by: USmarine1
do you know that in games FPS stand for first person shooter
Did you know in games and consoles and computers and animations and in all graphics FPS means Frames per Second as well? Seriously, he knows what he's talking about,
I'd rather see 150 FPS, but seeing as that is improbable on a console at this point, 60 sounds good to me! Maybe 80. That would be nice. If my dream of 150 does come true though at least we know we can all say my Xbox runs Halo: Reach. And we can say it to fanboys. : )
150 FPS would be completely pointless. 99.99% of TVs will top out at 60 fps, so you don't need to go above that.
Yes I would like to see 60 fps. Yes I would also like to see people who understand that fps is both first person shooter and frames per second, I'm talking to you USmarine1.
When I said 150 FPS I was joking. 100% joking. I know it's not possible now. At some point though TV's will be able to handle it, and games will follow.
Ontopic:
Better FPS may me worse graphics, but only in a give some to take some scenario, You can increase both at the same time, and I would rather have optimum FPS than optimum graphics.Well, in older CRT monitors, 120 fps is entirely possible but pretty much pointless because there is no difference above 85 fps. But anyway I would rather have high graphics than high FPS. 30 fps is totally acceptable and playable. And if Halo went 60 fps, it would just look.....weird. We've been stuck at 30 fps for so long.