Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Battlefield: 2552?
  • Subject: Battlefield: 2552?
Subject: Battlefield: 2552?

Check out the Postgame Carnage Report! The uncensored, NSFW Halo fan podcast!

Large. Open. Battlefields.

I'm not saying this should be Battlefield: 2552, but something large scale and along those lines would be pretty sick in my opinion.

Imagine swarming massive landscapes riddled with covie and UNSC infantry and vehicles scrapping it out. Having the choice to either operate vehicles, fly aircraft like longswords, pelicans, etc. (fly evac and drop off option) or choose a loadout and jump straight into the trenches.

They could always design smaller more traditional maps for slayer and other classic mayhem and carnage, but I would absolutely love to see a huge battleground to run around in and blow stuff up.

thoughts? If Bungie added a large-scale taste to Reach what are some elements you'd like to see?

Player classes? Vehicle types? discuss!

[Edited on 08.09.2009 8:04 AM PDT]

  • 08.09.2009 7:58 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

The name made me lol

  • 08.09.2009 8:01 AM PDT

Check out the Postgame Carnage Report! The uncensored, NSFW Halo fan podcast!

Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
The name made me lol


Heh, needs to be an attention getter.

  • 08.09.2009 8:02 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member

Iam enjoying Halo Reach and revisiting some past Bungie games, iam a big fan of Bungie and their online community.

I couldnt agree more with what you just said.

  • 08.09.2009 8:04 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Sk1ll4x3D
Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
The name made me lol


Heh, needs to be an attention getter.
Well it got my attention and I do love the idea of big battles

  • 08.09.2009 8:05 AM PDT

Check out the Postgame Carnage Report! The uncensored, NSFW Halo fan podcast!

Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
Posted by: Sk1ll4x3D
Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
The name made me lol


Heh, needs to be an attention getter.
Well it got my attention and I do love the idea of big battles


Well, if you look at it how could it not be a perfect fit for a game revolving around the fall of reach? It by all means and purposes SHOULD have crazy-huge battles or at least campaign/multiplayer sequences that involve large scale battle. It's Reach for pete's sake!

If you were to travel into the future and ask the master chief about the battle of reach his response would of course be:

"OMG do you has n-e idea how big deal this R ?"

  • 08.09.2009 8:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Sk1ll4x3D
Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
Posted by: Sk1ll4x3D
Posted by: Buzz Killingtin
The name made me lol


Heh, needs to be an attention getter.
Well it got my attention and I do love the idea of big battles


Well, if you look at it how could it not be a perfect fit for a game revolving around the fall of reach? It by all means and purposes SHOULD have crazy-huge battles or at least campaign/multiplayer sequences that involve large scale battle. It's Reach for pete's sake!

If you were to travel into the future and ask the master chief about the battle of reach his response would of course be:

"OMG do you has n-e idea how big deal this R ?"
But I do agree with you I do want big battles

  • 08.09.2009 8:19 AM PDT

Maybe it will be Team Battlefield 2552: Future Warfare. Then it'll be a mix of just about every great shooter.

Big battles could be good. They'll have to do a large overhaul on their network code, because currently 8v8 in Halo 3 seems to be hard to get a good connection. They'd have to make the gameplay very unique to still have the feel of a Halo game in such a large environment.

[Edited on 08.09.2009 8:37 AM PDT]

  • 08.09.2009 8:36 AM PDT