Halo 3: ODST Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: should halo really end after ODST and reach?
  • Subject: should halo really end after ODST and reach?
Subject: should halo really end after ODST and reach?

I'm kind of big on screenshots. I love taking them and I love looking at what others are capable of, so feel free to send your shots my way if you want some nice feedback!

~Best Screenshot Group Around~

~My Reach File Share~

~My Halo 3 File Share~

do you think bungie would be able to pull off more after their production of reach?

  • 08.10.2009 6:10 PM PDT

BAM said the lady

no but unfortinatly microsoft is being a major ***hole and is giving the halo franchise over to 343 studios... they are terrible.

  • 08.10.2009 6:11 PM PDT

Bungie isn't "ending" Halo after Reach. They want to try something different, show people that they can make something other than halo, try out other ideas. In the future they'll open up the abandoned cryotube and we'll see our buddy Chief again. There's no way Bungie could just abandon their most treasured story.

  • 08.10.2009 6:13 PM PDT

I am a Halo 3 Failure.

Halo isn't ending, there are going to be games after this, but it's gone on for ten years, it's time to put the old dog down, it would have happened some time or another.

  • 08.10.2009 6:14 PM PDT

There's not much left to tell about Halo. The novels, games, and now ODST pretty much cover every aspect of the Halo story. The only mystery left is where is Master Chief, but I don't think we'll find that out for a while, a long while.

  • 08.10.2009 6:21 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

uhm halo shouldnt end

  • 08.10.2009 6:26 PM PDT

Member of The LAO clan. if anyone wants to join, send message GT: aceman20001

here is my honest opinion...bungie is doing a good thing by ending the franchise. i think they realize that the fans don't want to see halo being milked which is what they came close to ( Halo Legends) i think there doing the right thing. it is time to give up the ghost. but i will miss the franchise. it's what got me in the fps in the first place. <tear>

  • 08.10.2009 6:28 PM PDT

if odst covers the rest of halo then there aint much to tell left. we alredy won the war

  • 08.10.2009 6:29 PM PDT

"Things are never as they seem..."

There might be some sort of hiatus. Bungie will observe what works and what doesn't in the upcoming future of FPS.... and Halo 4 will be something so amazing, it'll be better than having Nathan Fillion, Adam Baldwin, and Alan Tudyk (arrrrgh!!) in. Which is hard enough to beat already.

  • 08.10.2009 6:32 PM PDT

You just got Shakespeared!

You all fail, theres a whole other side to tell the war from. Covenet. or after, i know it won't be the same put its still halo and I love it.

[Edited on 08.10.2009 6:33 PM PDT]

  • 08.10.2009 6:32 PM PDT

They could make a few more games, like the origins of the forerunners and the covenant, or even the entire war. But other than that, there isn't much left to say.

  • 08.10.2009 6:33 PM PDT

It is the soldier, not the reporter, Who has given us freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet, Who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the organizer, Who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.
It is the soldier, Who salutes the flag, Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag

yes

  • 08.10.2009 6:43 PM PDT

Retreating is not cowardly, it's just fighting in a different direction

I think it's it the rite time for bungie to try something else after Reach, but im still gunna miss halo :/

  • 08.10.2009 6:47 PM PDT

"Let me turret, you suck at it. Don't be sad we all know it."

Posted by: MarineManiac HC
do you think bungie would be able to pull off more after their production of reach?

They will. They confirmed a new game after Reach is released. Hang in there mate \,,/(-_-)\,,/

  • 08.10.2009 6:52 PM PDT