- Casual Cult
- |
- Heroic Member
I'll hold the rope..... and the camera. 'Cause I'm a multitasker like that.
As agile as a cougar on a young man.
Ok, if you say so boss!
Wildcard Machinima!
Posted by: darthnazgul
Also there's tons of weapons, but only one or two are unique. We don't need two dozen assault rifles in a game where there's barely any hp. A lot of the weapons and perks just ruin the game, especially if you don't have many weapons and perks because all the people who got to the required ranks would be camping with their cheap weapons and perks causing you to constantly lose and lose. Also the rpg is completely useless, it NEVER hits, it just defies physics and flies harmlessly into a wall. The campers in CoD are always a big problem, in Halo they would only camp for one minute tops before someone kills them. Halo has much more replay value, with the custom game variants,forge and theatre mode. I got CoD 4 because all my friends wouldn't stop spamming me invites to it, and I was actually excited when I got it. When I played the multiplayer I just said to myself "this sucks!" and I only really played it for the single player which I thought was good but not good enough to make up for the multiplayer.
/rant
Do you play COD4 like you play Halo?
You shouldn't. When Halo is run and gun, shoot in face, COD4 takes strategy, you have to plan your moves. I like Halo, but one thing that I see is that more people like Halo because it's simple, easy, and mostly no serious thinking required. In COD4 you find a camper, you get killed, then you sneak behind him and take him out or snipe him. In Halo you find a camper and you can kill him easily.
Camping is a strategy!, but you should only camp for about twenty to thirty seconds or a big group will be after you.