Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Please Lock This, Thank You
  • Subject: Please Lock This, Thank You
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Please Lock This, Thank You

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Some people are getting this, others are getting mad so just lock this.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:56 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:22 AM PDT
Subject: I Dont't Think People Realize This Yet.

Proud director of Black Plasma Studios. Check us out on Youtube!

But they can still have new vehicles in the engine. A vulture can be considered new, since it never appeared in any FPS games. I think that's what we mean.

And your logic is pointless. The spectre appeared then dissappeaed.

  • 08.13.2009 10:24 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: DJAMESB
they can have test vehicles weapons equipment that you can use that never got put in the field(other than reach)
you-0

me-1
That would still go against cannon for the simple fact they never mentioned "test" vehicles, or weapons for that matter.

  • 08.13.2009 10:28 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: Arbiter 617
But they can still have new vehicles in the engine. A vulture can be considered new, since it never appeared in any FPS games. I think that's what we mean.

And your logic is pointless. The spectre appeared then dissappeaed.
This is true, but what im saying is stop with the threads to design new things for the games. Its never going to happen. Also the spectre disappears for obvious reasons

  • 08.13.2009 10:30 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: DK daze
Dude I don't care and my grammer is perfect.I used "Big", as you recall it to mak is specific."to not do...",is incorrect beause "do" is present tense/perfect(or future) when it was a past tense.

The BR existed during halo CE, but we never saw it until halo 2. Who are you to say that there are no weapons or vehicles that were simply never seen in any of the games?

  • 08.13.2009 10:31 AM PDT

"I only speak two languages: English and Bad English,"
-Bruce Willis, The Fifth Element

I escaped into the waves. The waves...
I went Underground!

If Halo Wars can do it, so can you. : D

Actually, Halo Wars was on the mark in this area, but I remember doing something wrong here.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:34 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:33 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
The BR existed during halo CE, but we never saw it until halo 2. Who are you to say that there are no weapons or vehicles that were simply never seen in any of the games?
Because this game happens within days of THE FIRST HALO

  • 08.13.2009 10:33 AM PDT

Remember,
It is easy to be male
it is another thing to be a man.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: Arbiter 617
But they can still have new vehicles in the engine. A vulture can be considered new, since it never appeared in any FPS games. I think that's what we mean.

And your logic is pointless. The spectre appeared then dissappeaed.
This is true, but what im saying is stop with the threads to design new things for the games. Its never going to happen. Also the spectre disappears for obvious reasons


Let the people have their cake. The create a ........... threads are just there to let the community use their imagination.

  • 08.13.2009 10:34 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: Peacekeeper MX
Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: Arbiter 617
But they can still have new vehicles in the engine. A vulture can be considered new, since it never appeared in any FPS games. I think that's what we mean.

And your logic is pointless. The spectre appeared then dissappeaed.
This is true, but what im saying is stop with the threads to design new things for the games. Its never going to happen. Also the spectre disappears for obvious reasons


Let the people have their cake. The create a ........... threads are just there to let the community use their imagination.
The sad part is most people in this forum think bungie looks over all the ideas...

  • 08.13.2009 10:35 AM PDT

ok that dosent mean anything! whether its in the past or not. cause in halo1 u had no hornet but in halo wars which is 20 before halo1 there is the hornet

  • 08.13.2009 10:35 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: DK daze
Dude I don't care and my grammer is perfect.I used "Big", as you recall it to mak is specific."to not do...",is incorrect beause "do" is present tense/perfect(or future) when it was a past tense.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
The BR existed during halo CE, but we never saw it until halo 2. Who are you to say that there are no weapons or vehicles that were simply never seen in any of the games?
Because this game happens within days of THE FIRST HALO
That doesn't answer my question. There could be, say, a Gauss rifle that was used on reach, but the PoA didn't stock it, and the Chief never got his hands on one.

  • 08.13.2009 10:36 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

They can add new weapons. It doesn't go against the canon.

  • 08.13.2009 10:36 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Yes, but that vehicle was featured in a halo game already. There's no way they can have them in reach, loose them in TWO halo games, and get them back. That idea is almost as bad as the lost shipment of BRs

  • 08.13.2009 10:37 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
The BR existed during halo CE, but we never saw it until halo 2. Who are you to say that there are no weapons or vehicles that were simply never seen in any of the games?
Because this game happens within days of THE FIRST HALO
That doesn't answer my question. There could be, say, a Gauss rifle that was used on reach, but the PoA didn't stock it, and the Chief never got his hands on one.
If the weapon existed he would have gotten one at some point in the trilogy. I understand what you mean, but its highly unlikely. Plus they would have had to mention it in the halo books at some point.

  • 08.13.2009 10:38 AM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"

I think the confusion is more in what a person means by "new". It would be a bit foolish to expect anything "new" in the timeline to appear in a prequal, however that doesn't mean that there won't be anything "new" to the series for this game.

There is a slight distinction.

  • 08.13.2009 10:39 AM PDT

Remember,
It is easy to be male
it is another thing to be a man.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: Peacekeeper MX
Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: Arbiter 617
But they can still have new vehicles in the engine. A vulture can be considered new, since it never appeared in any FPS games. I think that's what we mean.

And your logic is pointless. The spectre appeared then dissappeaed.
This is true, but what im saying is stop with the threads to design new things for the games. Its never going to happen. Also the spectre disappears for obvious reasons


Let the people have their cake. The create a ........... threads are just there to let the community use their imagination.
The sad part is most people in this forum think bungie looks over all the ideas...


You never know they might. Personally i hope they look at one idea in particular this one.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:39 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:39 AM PDT

Five Tenets of Bungie.net Forum Life:
1. Trolls will always be well fed.
2. Blame-ability thy name is stosh.
3. Bungie has no control over retail prices.
4. Watch out for low-flying defense drones.
5. Seven is not optional, but rather, an inevitability.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Halo Reach is set IN THE PAST meaning they cant have new weapons, vehicles, or armor. For bungie to do this would screw with the whole plot line of the Halo games.


Not really. Most of the weapons and equipment available in Halo 2/3 was available pre-Halo 1. The only thing I don't see being in for canon reasons is the Mark VI armor.

Of course, there's a semi-valid point regard the inclusion of "Create A *Item*" threads.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:41 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:39 AM PDT
  • gamertag: Bredus
  • user homepage:

This is my signature

There was that mine that Master Chief used in Fall of Reach when he was battling above Reach, they could bring that in

  • 08.13.2009 10:40 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Posted by: SweetTRIX
I think the confusion is more in what a person means by "new". It would be a bit foolish to expect anything "new" in the timeline to appear in a prequal, however that doesn't mean that there won't be anything "new" to the series for this game.

There is a slight distinction.
Very well said, that's what I've been trying to say. Bungie can't just go into the forums pull out the "coolest" weapon and put it in the game.

  • 08.13.2009 10:40 AM PDT

http://www.halo-forum.com

Reach should mainy utilise Halo CE weapons. If they want to introduce "new" weapons they would actually be old weapons like the MA5k or the MA2B cut down versions of the Assault Rifle. The Book siad there was prototypes of the SMG and BR but they werent in use at that time.

  • 08.13.2009 10:40 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: DK daze
Dude I don't care and my grammer is perfect.I used "Big", as you recall it to mak is specific."to not do...",is incorrect beause "do" is present tense/perfect(or future) when it was a past tense.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Yes, but that vehicle was featured in a halo game already. There's no way they can have them in reach, loose them in TWO halo games, and get them back. That idea is almost as bad as the lost shipment of BRs
Halo: Contact harvest has a chapter that begins with johnson riding on a hornet. That chapter takes place in 2525. The hornet was absent from halo 1 and halo 2, but it is still in halo 3. Just because something is not in a game or two (or three), doesn't mean it didn't exist in the past.

  • 08.13.2009 10:41 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

I think everyone is confused as to what i mean. I am fine with things like helmet cams and stuff that's been in any HALO game, but you can't just go and create your own Halo fantasy world.

  • 08.13.2009 10:42 AM PDT

I don't see you doing anything to help our country.
Except sitting at home, naked, eating twinkies, rubbing your hands together going "Heh. Target Destroyed. Mission Accomplished." Oh wait. that's not helping.

Sorry for double post, internet went slow.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:43 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:43 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: DK daze
Dude I don't care and my grammer is perfect.I used "Big", as you recall it to mak is specific."to not do...",is incorrect beause "do" is present tense/perfect(or future) when it was a past tense.

Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
Posted by: Black Eagle X99
Posted by: A1N2G3U4S
The BR existed during halo CE, but we never saw it until halo 2. Who are you to say that there are no weapons or vehicles that were simply never seen in any of the games?
Because this game happens within days of THE FIRST HALO
That doesn't answer my question. There could be, say, a Gauss rifle that was used on reach, but the PoA didn't stock it, and the Chief never got his hands on one.
If the weapon existed he would have gotten one at some point in the trilogy. I understand what you mean, but its highly unlikely. Plus they would have had to mention it in the halo books at some point.
I understand your reasoning, but let's agree to disagree.

[Edited on 08.13.2009 10:46 AM PDT]

  • 08.13.2009 10:44 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2