- Bliznade
- |
- Exalted Member
Posted by: z0rgy
I sure as hell dont.
why?
host based mp (aka super host soldier)
elites getting less stuff or disadvantages
HORRIBLE campaign
edit : bad graphics for H3, aliasing, game full of bug with armors glitching. etc.
...they'd have to try hard to make a worse game to be honest.
I took out extra stuff I'm not going to talk about, but Host Based MP isn't that terrible, yeah servers would be better but if they can't afford it/don't want to have to afford it then who cares? It's not like the host is the best player only because he's the host... If you're good you don't need to be host to win. Elites have less armor permutations, so what? That's not a disadvantage. That's countered by the fact that it's harder (or about impossible) to hs them from behind. The campaign, I thought, was amazing. I own all 3 Halo games, plus Halo PC and CE (Custom Edition, yes that's what CE stands for if you're a PC player, get off me...) and the only campaign that I could stand to play through was Halo 3's. It is actually my favorite experience from the game. The graphics are amazing, you have to be blind to not think that. They may not be 'realistic' but they aren't meant to be. They're meant to give you the feel of playing Halo. And they did. I've only ever seen one armor glitch in my time playing H3 (and that was a lot of time,) and it was on a video my friend showed me in theatre. People need to think about what they're saying. Halo 3 wasn't bad at all, I'd rather play H3 over H2 any day, H1 is still the best, but 3 is still all around more fun and more revolutionary than H2 ever was.