Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Bungie needs to delay Reach to make it the Best Game EVAH?
  • Subject: Bungie needs to delay Reach to make it the Best Game EVAH?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Bungie needs to delay Reach to make it the Best Game EVAH?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSEbo-7U_U

Even though they've been two or more years into Reach, it think Bungie should delay it to 2015 or something, to make it the best game EVAH. When holographic technology exists and you can play 10,000 vs 10,000 MP matches.

  • 08.17.2009 8:02 PM PDT

Andrew Murray
Map:Aztec-Keep
Screenshot:ghosts
Video:32/0 Perfection

well i don't know about the 10,000 vs 10,000 but i agree with the delay thing!

  • 08.17.2009 8:03 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)

No.

Why delay making money and give us a perfectly good game when you can release it and make two more?

[Edited on 08.17.2009 8:04 PM PDT]

  • 08.17.2009 8:03 PM PDT

Jacoby

I guess I could survive a bit longer withou reach, but 2015 holy -BLAM- thats six years away. and there is the possibility of a new xbox by than.

  • 08.17.2009 8:05 PM PDT

rotflol good idea. or they can be bungie and make release it on 2010 and have 20,000 vs 20,000 with perfect connection...why do i say this? cause its bungie and they can do anything..


yeah 10,000 vs 10,000 would be nice tho

  • 08.17.2009 8:05 PM PDT

Andrew Murray
Map:Aztec-Keep
Screenshot:ghosts
Video:32/0 Perfection

Posted by: Tibetz
No.

Why delay making money and give us a perfectly good game when you can release it and make two more?
because they said there done making halo's and microsoft is moving halo over to 343 industrie's.

  • 08.17.2009 8:06 PM PDT

Snakie Purple.

"Hamdog, Hamdog, Hamdog, Hamdog"-Hamdog.

Twatter

..It' been in development Three years.....That's before Halo 3 was out.

  • 08.17.2009 8:08 PM PDT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSEbo-7U_U

Posted by: arachnid223
Posted by: Tibetz
No.

Why delay making money and give us a perfectly good game when you can release it and make two more?
because they said there done making halo's and microsoft is moving halo over to 343 industrie's.


Yes

  • 08.17.2009 8:12 PM PDT

Check out the group, Planet Reach and talk about Bungie's next game without the annoyance of the public forum. Oh and it's nice there too.

You thought you had lag, it took Jesus 3 days to re-spawn.

Posted by: Arbiduck
..It' been in development Three years.....That's before Halo 3 was out.


Which is the average amount of development time. So, no, it doesn't need to be delayed for any amount of time. At least not for any outlandish reasons like the one the OP throws out there.

[Edited on 08.17.2009 8:14 PM PDT]

  • 08.17.2009 8:14 PM PDT

Sieg Zeon

the forum trolls are just as dumb as ever

remember people dont feed the trolls, it only encourages them

  • 08.17.2009 8:56 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I just hope the game is good, with a fun storyline and multi player.

  • 08.17.2009 10:10 PM PDT

"I just looked at a 7-day forecast. Furnace. Ugly. Cooking. Killer. Yowtch! Overcooked. Unbearable. I've never had it spell out "-blam!- you" on me before." -Facetious Sage

The intelligence of my questions shall be directly proportional to the intelligence of your thread, and you will like it! -Jesusismyhomey

Delaying it until 2015 just means they'll spend TOO much time on it, and it will be overworked and the quality will suffer for it.

They're been working on it since not long after Halo 3 came out, that's long enough.

  • 08.17.2009 10:33 PM PDT

I don't see what mroe they can do for a game they've been developing for 3 years with another 6. That's 9 years of game development. By the time they're done the first 6 years of development would have been a waste because technology would have changed so much those 6 yrs of advanced and amazing technologies they incorporated into the game will be old and boring. If they really did wait until 2015, I'd assume the new Xbox would be out by then, and then there would juts be a Halo ring, all open world, and you would just walk around the Halo all day killing people. No rounds, no matches, no game modes, just walking around killin people all day. That is just funny to think about. 10,000 vs 10,000 would be more boring than watching and waiting for a log to rot.

  • 08.17.2009 10:41 PM PDT

Loose talk is noose talk.

Nah. It's fine as it is.

  • 08.17.2009 11:51 PM PDT

Hope to someday work at this place! :)

I'd say next year is fine for Reach, but yeah they should DEFINITELY make a new Halo when the next Xbox comes out. that wuld b killa'! A few non-haloe games would be cool for a change in between Reach and then though, eh?

  • 08.18.2009 12:01 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can't kill what's dead.

Stand. Fight. Resist. S2F.

I'd say delay it a year.

Now 5 years is a bit much... and so is 10k vs. 10k.

  • 08.18.2009 12:29 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

No.

Posted by: Another one
Posted by: Arbiduck
..It' been in development Three years.....That's before Halo 3 was out.


Which is the average amount of development time. So, no, it doesn't need to be delayed for any amount of time. At least not for any outlandish reasons like the one the OP throws out there.


I know right!

Halo 3 wasn't delayed and it turned out perfectly fine!....wait...

  • 08.18.2009 12:38 AM PDT
  • gamertag: Dootuz
  • user homepage:

This was Dootuz117 but i changed accounts
M!
97% OF TEENS WON'T STAND UP FOR GOD. IF YOU'RE ONE OF THE 3% WHO WILL, PUT THIS IN YOUR SIG.
Posted by: just another fan
Yeah, because we all know that weird guys on youtube always speak the truth.

Posted by: Hot Sauce 147
Posting on bungie.net should require that the user has had to have read a chapter book all the way through.

No but they should maybe wait longer to make it better. as for 10k vs 10k.....


No.
-----------------------------------

Posted by: master piraka
Posted by: Another one
Posted by: Arbiduck
..It' been in development Three years.....That's before Halo 3 was out.


Which is the average amount of development time. So, no, it doesn't need to be delayed for any amount of time. At least not for any outlandish reasons like the one the OP throws out there.


I know right!

Halo 3 wasn't delayed and it turned out perfectly fine!....wait...


Halo 3 sucks.

That's right I said it. Halo 3 had some much stuff cut from it. It could have been great. I HATE Halo 3. Now I am a HUGE Halo fan and have been for a LONG time. But I HATE(or don't like a lot) Halo 3.
Halo 3 is just too broken.

Halo 1 ftw.

[Edited on 08.18.2009 2:34 AM PDT]

  • 08.18.2009 2:31 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

No.

Doesn't entirely suck... But it just seemed like they spent too much time rebuilding and not enough time updating. They ended up with Halo 2.5 instead of Halo 3. I mean, I still play Halo 3 regularly, but I am still dissapoint.

  • 08.20.2009 8:40 PM PDT

Take as much time as you need, Bungie.

Give us the game as was absolutely intended this time around.

  • 08.20.2009 9:11 PM PDT

BOOM DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bliznade
By the time they're done the first 6 years of development would have been a waste because technology would have changed so much those 6 yrs of advanced and amazing technologies they incorporated into the game will be old and boring.
You really think a plasma pistol will be out by 2015?

  • 08.20.2009 9:22 PM PDT

Were it so easy.

No, make it come out ATLEAST one year before the world ends (2012) :)

  • 08.20.2009 9:36 PM PDT

Check out the group, Planet Reach and talk about Bungie's next game without the annoyance of the public forum. Oh and it's nice there too.

You thought you had lag, it took Jesus 3 days to re-spawn.

Posted by: master piraka
Posted by: Another one
Posted by: Arbiduck
..It' been in development Three years.....That's before Halo 3 was out.[/quote]

Which is the average amount of development time. So, no, it doesn't need to be delayed for any amount of time. At least not for any outlandish reasons like the one the OP throws out there.


I know right!

Halo 3 wasn't delayed and it turned out perfectly fine!....wait...


Halo 3 sucks.

That's right I said it. Halo 3 had some much stuff cut from it. It could have been great. I HATE Halo 3. Now I am a HUGE Halo fan and have been for a LONG time. But I HATE(or don't like a lot) Halo 3.
Halo 3 is just too broken.

Halo 1 ftw.


No, Halo 3 doesn't suck. Everyone on this forum is so blinded by their love of Halo CE. It was a good game, but the nostalgia of your first encounter with Halo has made you blind to its flaws. It had a better campaign, but that's about all it has over Halo 3. Nothing, absolutely nothing, else is better.

  • 08.20.2009 9:52 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2