Halo 3: ODST Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: One tiny mistake Bungie.
  • Subject: One tiny mistake Bungie.
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: One tiny mistake Bungie.

did you ever think that the spartan laser was around in halo 2 but we just never saw it, its a storyline maybe we just didnt run across it

  • 08.19.2009 11:58 AM PDT

I just wasted a few seconds of your life and you're never getting them back!

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
i'm an idiot because some bunch of -blam!- wanted to earn some money off someone elses game but made it a RPG?!!???! obviously you're the retard that goes and buys a game that's based off someone elses game. you FAIL
Posted by: Spartan 100
Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Posted by: Spartan 100
Disagree.
Halo wars.

Halo Wars wasn't made by Bungie therefore for me it's a Rip Off Halo game not a Halo Game.

It is not a ''rip off''. And if you think so then you are an idiot.


The only idiot here is you. Ensemble asked Bungie for permission to use the Halo universe and they could've said no. HW is an excellent game, and you know what? Its not a f-ing RPG you IDIOT!

"made it a RPG"- it's called an RTS, and a damn fine one at that.

But more on topic...its because it's called a game and they hadn't thought of the SL at the time.

[Edited on 08.20.2009 2:58 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 2:56 AM PDT

It's a -blam!- video game.

And that's a quote, btw.

  • 08.20.2009 2:57 AM PDT

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Okay we all know that the game takes place during Halo 2 nearing towards Halo 3.
We all got that part.
BUT!!!
How come we get to use Spartan Laser this time arround but not back in Halo 2? I know weare going to play ODST's and they have "UBER SICK WEAPONS WITH SILENCERS THAT DON'T EVEN DO THEIR JOB" but that's something that I personnaly don't think it will outcome well.
I'm not trying to flame you dear Bungie I am waiting for this game because it does look great but I just wanted to point that out.

Now question to the community what do you think about it? Do you agree with me in a way? Or don''t you really care about it as long the game is Sick?

Peace.

The Spartan laser has existed for years durring the events of Halo 2, Chief just never came across one until Halo 3.
Oh yeah, it might have helped if you played Halo wars also.
/thread

  • 08.20.2009 2:58 AM PDT

Posted by: HighArkAngel
Posted by: CABOOSE rules
i'm an idiot because some bunch of -blam!- wanted to earn some money off someone elses game but made it a RPG?!!???! obviously you're the retard that goes and buys a game that's based off someone elses game. you FAIL
Posted by: Spartan 100
Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Posted by: Spartan 100
Disagree.
Halo wars.

Halo Wars wasn't made by Bungie therefore for me it's a Rip Off Halo game not a Halo Game.

It is not a ''rip off''. And if you think so then you are an idiot.


The only idiot here is you. Ensemble asked Bungie for permission to use the Halo universe and they could've said no. HW is an excellent game, and you know what? Its not a f-ing RPG you IDIOT!

"made it a RPG"- it's called an RTS, and a damn fine one at that.

But more on topic...its because it's called a game and they hadn't thought of the SL at the time.

Right, its not a ripp-off, its licensed, microsoft owns Halo, not Bungie, also I have to dissagree with you about it being a damn fine RTS, its a fun game and all, its just over simplified and doesn't live up to other RTSs like Age of Empires, which was done by the same studio.

[Edited on 08.20.2009 3:01 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:00 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Posted by: Spartan 100
Disagree.
Halo wars.

Halo Wars wasn't made by Bungie therefore for me it's a Rip Off Halo game not a Halo Game.


its bungies story and so what bungie didnt make it?

plus for not being a fps it kicked as* it would have even more if i was a fps but hay it gave it a new feel to halo

[Edited on 08.20.2009 3:31 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:24 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Legendary Member

Keep It Clean!

To the OP: The Laser has existed quite some time before Halo 3. And if you really think about it, the Splazer is in Halo 2, because it is in Halo 3: ODST. That said, I think you just got owned =D
Edit: I noticed you talked about using it in Halo 2. Well, it's the same reason anyways.

[Edited on 08.20.2009 3:31 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:28 AM PDT

Bam! Said the lady.

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Okay we all know that the game takes place during Halo 2 nearing towards Halo 3.
We all got that part.
BUT!!!
How come we get to use Spartan Laser this time arround but not back in Halo 2? I know weare going to play ODST's and they have "UBER SICK WEAPONS WITH SILENCERS THAT DON'T EVEN DO THEIR JOB" but that's something that I personnaly don't think it will outcome well.


Your an idiot

The humans make the jump to halo on September 19th 2552 ,halo 3 finishes on March 3rd 2553. in that time frame very few new weapons would of been created at all existing materials would be used to create more of the already existing weapons and ammo. Every UNSC weapon and vehicle = encouted would of been created before the first game.
Facts to support this are

Halo Wars (its not a rip off, it is cannon and its a bloody good game now grow up)
in which there is hornets, splasers and elephants present (none of which were seen in game up until halo 3) there is many more weapons and vehicles in the halo universe some of which havnt been seen in game to date such as the M99 Stanchion Gauss Rifle, the MA5K, the HMG-38 or the MA2B. these are all canon and if any of them where introduced into halo 3 ODST it would be perfectly fine and not go againts pre written lore.

The spartan laser is most likely named so as a properganda tool the official weapon name has nothing to do with spartans at all Weapon/Anti-Vehicle Model 6 Grindell/Galilean Nonlinear Rifle. marines will of named it the spartan laser out of the similarity to MJOLNIR armour and its effectiveness in battle.

There is Thousands of different guns in operation around the world today now are you telling me that soilders in battle today are using every variation of every gun still in operation? no there not ....





[Edited on 08.20.2009 3:36 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:31 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
"UBER SICK WEAPONS WITH SILENCERS THAT DON'T EVEN DO THEIR JOB"



A suppressor, sound suppressor, sound moderator, or silencer, is a device either attached to or part of the barrel of a firearm to reduce the amount of noise and flash generated by firing the weapon. Although suppressors are popularly known as silencers, no suppressor completely eliminates the noise of discharging a firearm.

  • 08.20.2009 3:37 AM PDT

Oh and to add the the "its a ripp off" argument, Bungie had a lot of imput on Halo wars, they didn't make it, but they had imput, not to mention they most likely approved the story before it was added to the game.

  • 08.20.2009 3:40 AM PDT

-A fatal error occured. Your opinion is not valid. Please restart your computer and try again with a different answer-
Spammed group invites or recruitments are NOT WELCOME!Unless i know you, DO NOT SPAM ME without a bloody good reason.

"Violence isnt the answer, but it sure is the solution"

Its like asking why the Halo 1 pistol vanished from Halo 2 and reappeared in 3.
Or why the Battle rifle wasn't in Halo 1, when it was clearly around at the time according to the books.

Its because they werent added into the game at that time.

  • 08.20.2009 3:47 AM PDT

Posted by: Slayer Lord
Its like asking why the Halo 1 pistol vanished from Halo 2 and reappeared in 3.
Or why the Battle rifle wasn't in Halo 1, when it was clearly around at the time according to the books.

Its because they werent added into the game at that time.

The Halo 3 pistol is not the Halo 1 pistol.


[Edited on 08.20.2009 3:50 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:49 AM PDT

If I was in a room with justin Bieber, Bin Laden, Hitler and a gun with two bullets I would Shoot Bieber twice.
Posted by:Albert Einstein
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

its not a silencer SMG/pistol they are Sound supressed that means quiter.....and yes they are doing their jobs because that is what a gun with a silencer/sound supressed what ever you want to call it sounds like.......its not as loud but there is some sound still

  • 08.20.2009 3:52 AM PDT

-A fatal error occured. Your opinion is not valid. Please restart your computer and try again with a different answer-
Spammed group invites or recruitments are NOT WELCOME!Unless i know you, DO NOT SPAM ME without a bloody good reason.

"Violence isnt the answer, but it sure is the solution"

Posted by: ArchedNature
Posted by: Slayer Lord
Its like asking why the Halo 1 pistol vanished from Halo 2 and reappeared in 3.
Or why the Battle rifle wasn't in Halo 1, when it was clearly around at the time according to the books.

Its because they werent added into the game at that time.

The Halo 3 pistol is not the Halo 1 pistol.
The only thing missing is the scope and a little power.

  • 08.20.2009 3:54 AM PDT

Anti Squeaker Association (join fool)
me and zeronos' awesome upcoming movie:
halo 3 THE NEXT teaser trailer
File Share
blooper reel for THE NEXT teaser trailer:
bloopers

Posted by: CABOOSE rules
Okay we all know that the game takes place during Halo 2 nearing towards Halo 3.
We all got that part.
BUT!!!
How come we get to use Spartan Laser this time arround but not back in Halo 2? I know weare going to play ODST's and they have "UBER SICK WEAPONS WITH SILENCERS THAT DON'T EVEN DO THEIR JOB" but that's something that I personnaly don't think it will outcome well.
I'm not trying to flame you dear Bungie I am waiting for this game because it does look great but I just wanted to point that out.

Now question to the community what do you think about it? Do you agree with me in a way? Or don''t you really care about it as long the game is Sick?

Peace.


The Spartan Laser was a prototype weapon, like the Rhino Artillery Tank from Halo Wars. They would have consumed too much power at the time and were only given to spartans because they were assumed to be the best protectors of these extremely expensive weapons (hence the name "spartan laser"). But as in the SL's description they require massive battery rechargers to be re-used.

Therefore being a prototype very expensive weapon they would have been given to people on a "need to use" basis.
In halo 2 there was no time to bring these weapons from storage as the attack on Earth was sudden and unexpected lasting only a few hours.
But once the dilemna was over and the ODST's were defending an ONI controlled building, they would have decided this WAS a "need to use" situation and handed one of these precious weapons over to Dutch and his team.

sorry for the semi-wall but that's my theory.

EDIT: If your wondering why chief didnt have SLs in halo CE if they were on the Autumn the ship was COMPLETELY done over and most of the good weapons would have gone to the spartans that went down to Reach in the pelican.
Since the pelican crashed and burned from an orbital drop i dont see ANYTHING surviving intact (minus the spartans who if i remember correctly jumped and used their gel layers and shields to crash into the bush hoping for survival)

IN halo 2 on the ring the depature of master chief was rushed end o story

[Edited on 08.20.2009 4:00 AM PDT]

  • 08.20.2009 3:55 AM PDT

Posted by: Slayer Lord
Posted by: ArchedNature
Posted by: Slayer Lord
Its like asking why the Halo 1 pistol vanished from Halo 2 and reappeared in 3.
Or why the Battle rifle wasn't in Halo 1, when it was clearly around at the time according to the books.

Its because they werent added into the game at that time.

The Halo 3 pistol is not the Halo 1 pistol.
The only thing missing is the scope and a little power.

And the fact that they are two completely different guns.
M6D=/=M6G

  • 08.20.2009 3:57 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3