Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [13 votes]: Should there be a cover system in Halo Reach?
  • Poll [13 votes]: Should there be a cover system in Halo Reach?
Subject: Should there be a cover system in Halo Reach?

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"
-whoever the heck made it up

Poll: Should there be a cover system in Halo Reach?  [closed]
Yes:  15%
(2 Votes)
No:  85%
(11 Votes)
Total Votes: 13

I think so because it would be more realistic and it would be more fun. so I say yes to cover system and also, no crouching is not a cover system and if u ever take cover behind a wall with an energy sword its really not smart. Unless a guy is within lunging range then its a good idea. Also i was thinkin u could still be in first person and still have a cover system it would be awsome

[Edited on 08.25.2009 4:01 PM PDT]

  • 08.25.2009 3:49 PM PDT

Five years older and wiser
The fires are burning, I'm fire, never tire
Slay warriors in the forests, and on hire

No.

  • 08.25.2009 3:52 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

cover + fps = dont work.

plus don't change the formula. halo is halo, and halo has no cover system.

  • 08.25.2009 3:52 PM PDT

It would be cool to have a cover system in a halo game but not Halo Reach

  • 08.25.2009 3:52 PM PDT

I don't think I've ever played an fps with a cover system. It doesn't work.

  • 08.25.2009 3:59 PM PDT

Look at Killzone 2. It's an FPS that has a cover system and they took it out of multiplayer because it simply DOESN'T WORK....even in Campaign it was pointless. I was still getting shot.

  • 08.25.2009 4:01 PM PDT