- SweetTRIX
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"
Posted by: ODST27
There are so many things wrong in this ENTIRE THREAD that I don't even know where to begin.
Posted by: Rakata
Bungie created it, everything bungie created is canon.
Halo:CE the first thing to come out stated that 117 is the last spartan, so did 2 and 3.
The Books say it ain't so. That alone proves that the books aren't canon to the games.
And you can't tell me that the books created about a videogame are more canon than the videogame itself. The exception is Contact Harvest, since the dude who wrote the rest of the halo story wrote that one aswell.It's has been said many many many times by Bungie that the books, graphic novels, ect. are all cannon. However, games override novels, and newer cannon overrides older cannon.
Halo Story Page: Would the books make the cut?
Joe Staten: The books are, for better or worse, part of the canon. In the future we may choose to revise or flat-out ignore some of the less appealing ideas (Johnson's biological immunity to the Flood, for example), but folks should treat them as defining elements of the Halo universe.How Stuff Works: The novelization of a video game is, well ... novel. Where does Eric Nyland <sic> get the background for his books?
Pete Parsons: We work closely with him on all the stories. So what we do is we have these story arcs of the "Halo" universe, and Eric goes in and says, "Well that's a really good piece to take and here is in a microcosm what I think that story will look like."
Thx much, was too lazy to find the old article.