- Sh1n1ng Wolf
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: theHurtfulTurkey
A real test of a man is if he is willing to scrape a sharpened razor up and down his junk just to please a woman.
Posted by: privet caboose
No offense, but Reach has been in development for 2 years now. If they are already using the old formula, it's to late to change now.That's actually not entirely true...
Many games that have been in development by companies have received radical changes (sometimes for the better, sometimes it f#$%s the game up) while in the development stages. Just look at Halo CE, it was supposed to be a RTS exclusively for the PC.
Although I would imagine you probably are right about them not making majour changes at this point. If Reach is classed based or if it is basically a Halo 3 remake, the decisions are probably final by now.
But at the same time, Bungie still has until 2010...Posted by: TW InKoGnIto
I hate how people vote no just because Call of Duty has classes.
You guys are really ignorant. Just like Congressmen! COD4 isn't truly classed based, it's more of a "perks" system. True class based games are like TF2.Posted by: P3P5I
Posted by: Tesla 123
why wont people stop making these threads. how would classes work?????? you choose between spartan and.........spartan????? It simply makes no sense. Halo is fine as it is, dont mess it up
I know seriously. I want Halo to stay the same. When Reach comes out I want Bungie to send me a sticker that says "Reach" and on the back it says, "to go on top of the 3 on your Halo 3 gamecase, <3 Bungie."Okay, go play Halo 3 then if you want Halo to stay stagnant.
[Edited on 09.16.2009 7:00 PM PDT]