Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [13 votes]: If Bungie incorperates natal in reach can you play the game without...
  • Poll [13 votes]: If Bungie incorperates natal in reach can you play the game without...
Subject: If Bungie incorperates natal in reach can you play the game without...

BAM said the lady

Poll: If Bungie incorperates natal in reach can you play the game without...  [closed]
yes:  85%
(11 Votes)
no:  15%
(2 Votes)
Total Votes: 13

If Bungie incorperates natal in reach can you play the game without it???

  • 09.13.2009 4:36 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

of course.

unless it's a natal only game. which would suck because motion capture will NEVER work with fps games.

  • 09.13.2009 4:38 PM PDT

BAM said the lady

i was thinking that to but i just realized that odst comes with the multiplayer and if it does that means ppl without natal can still play cause it comes with a game that uses a controller

  • 09.13.2009 4:39 PM PDT

They wont incorporate it. Trust me, it's WAY too late into the development cycle, and the beta is being released before Natal is.

Some people speculate that is will be used for the menus (it wont). But Bungie isn't going to push a $100-200 peripheral just for menus. That would alienate their fans, and cut down on sales.

  • 09.13.2009 4:50 PM PDT

I thought I heard at some point you can play games that weren't even designed for it; you can play Burnout: Paradise using Natal's controls for example, a game released way before Natal was in the minds of the public.

If Microsoft is smart, they'll continue to try and cater to everyone: that includes people who just want to play with the everyday controller.

  • 09.13.2009 4:53 PM PDT

Posted by: urk
Eat raw meat.
Punch a bear in the face.


If you don't know who I am, the feeling is mutual.

Posted by: z0rgy
of course.

unless it's a natal only game. which would suck because motion capture will NEVER work with fps games.
I think of motion controllers like Wii Sports and Call of Duty 3 (The only Wii FPS I've ever had the displeasure of playing).

Wii Sports is not a game as much as a gimmick. It's fun at first but it's get old FAST. Plus, it's not something you can play to relax.

Call of Duty 3 is an okay game. I have it for the 360. I played it on the Wii however, and it was terrible. The controls were bad, uncomfortable, and aiming was hard (Since my hands shake a lot).

Gimmicky games and bad controlling are the main reasons I'm against Natal and the Wii in general (Oh, and whatever Sony is cooking up).

  • 09.13.2009 5:12 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Mythic Member
  • gamertag: P3P5I
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Achronos
It isn't our shiznit anymore.

Posted by: z0rgy
motion capture will NEVER work with fps games.

I disagree.

  • 09.13.2009 6:24 PM PDT

durrrrrr

/thread

  • 09.13.2009 6:29 PM PDT