Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo should go back to the roots that made it amazing
  • Subject: Halo should go back to the roots that made it amazing
Subject: Halo should go back to the roots that made it amazing

Moderator Notice: This user has been blacklisted from this forum. Until the user is removed from the blacklist, all posts this user has made have been hidden, and all topics created by this user have been censored.
  • 09.14.2009 3:27 PM PDT

Your friend is not a reliable source of information

halo 1 won awards because it was original, do you honestly think that if halo 3 and halo 1 were to come out at the same time halo 1 more get more awards than halo 3?

  • 09.14.2009 4:39 PM PDT

Posted by: Monkeyjoe78
halo 1 won awards because it was original, do you honestly think that if halo 3 and halo 1 were to come out at the same time halo 1 more get more awards than halo 3?
This statement is true and makes your entire thread void.

[Edited on 09.14.2009 4:43 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 4:43 PM PDT

Posted by: RELLIK PIR
Funny how you talk having never or barely played HCE and H2
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

  • 09.14.2009 4:52 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

Posted by: RELLIK PIR
Funny how you talk having never or barely played HCE and H2


you're just angry someone found a crack in your bulletproof armored reasoning.

the first of everything is always the best because there is a sense of originality to it. the sequels are just "take what you've discovered, add some spice, and enjoy. you know how it feels already, it's just tweaked a bit".
this goes for books, movies, games, even music sometimes.

  • 09.14.2009 4:54 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Halo Combat Evolved
I got dem BrAiNDAwGS in me

Posted by: Kurty66
Posted by: Monkeyjoe78
halo 1 won awards because it was original, do you honestly think that if halo 3 and halo 1 were to come out at the same time halo 1 more get more awards than halo 3?
This statement is true and makes your entire thread void.



No it doesn't Halo CE would still win so eat a dick.

  • 09.14.2009 5:12 PM PDT

So by 'roots that made it amazing' you mean a game where one weapon doesn't fulfill the role of every other one?

  • 09.14.2009 5:13 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

wtf? how does posting one liners have anythig to do with what you have played and what you havent? lmao this guy needs to walk outside and get some fresh air i think that basement isnt doing you any good.

  • 09.14.2009 5:15 PM PDT

Why do you just say people have not played halo 2 when they say your reasoning is wrong. Everyone is this forum has played halo 2. And atleast 98% of people have played halo 1.

Your just wrong. Accept it. If halo 3 and halo 1 came out at teh same time. Halo 3 would kick its ass.
And they are right about it not seeming as good as the first one because it is nolonger original.
Thats just how it works....Go watch a movie, Then watch it over agian? Dose it seem as new and awsome as the first time? NO. It only starts to get as good if you don't watch it for a long time. And this is part of the reson people think halo 1 is so good. They play halo 3 over and over, Every day and get sick of it. Then the play halo 1 once and it seems better becasue its like new. But the truth is, If you played halo 1 everyday all the time then halo 3 would seem better.


And another thing. You say how crapy halo 2 and 3 are but you obvously bought the games and play them. So they had to be good if you play them and are a big enough fan to be in this forum.
I sence some trolling.

[Edited on 09.14.2009 5:26 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 5:17 PM PDT

...I'm Pretty sure Bungie made all the games. If your talking about one guy, i also don't think one guy at bungie could take all the greatness with him if he left. And they added dual wielding, equipment, boarding, new guns, vastly improved graphics etc. What do you really want in a halo game anyway?

  • 09.14.2009 5:50 PM PDT

Posted by: sdmblack
...I'm Pretty sure Bungie made all the games. If your talking about one guy, i also don't think one guy at bungie could take all the greatness with him if he left. And they added dual wielding, equipment, boarding, new guns, vastly improved graphics etc. What do you really want in a halo game anyway?


He wants halo 1 with better graphics. Thats all these people that say halo 1 is somuch better want. I dont know if they can't afford a 360 or what, but they acualy want Bungie to make halo 1 with updated graphics so they dont feel like out of date losers playing it.....Its so stupid.....

[Edited on 09.14.2009 5:53 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 5:52 PM PDT

What are the roots exactly? You just stated that Halo CE got more awards than Halo 3, nothing else.
You are also being ignorant about saying that they played little of Halo CE and Halo 2.

  • 09.14.2009 5:55 PM PDT

Andrew Murray
Map:Aztec-Keep
Screenshot:ghosts
Video:32/0 Perfection

Posted by: BIGNERENT
Why do you just say people have not played halo 2 when they say your reasoning is wrong. Everyone is this forum has played halo 2. And atleast 98% of people have played halo 1.

Your just wrong. Accept it. If halo 3 and halo 1 came out at teh same time. Halo 3 would kick its ass.
And they are right about it not seeming as good as the first one because it is nolonger original.
Thats just how it works....Go watch a movie, Then watch it over agian? Dose it seem as new and awsome as the first time? NO. It only starts to get as good if you don't watch it for a long time. And this is part of the reson people think halo 1 is so good. They play halo 3 over and over, Every day and get sick of it. Then the play halo 1 once and it seems better becasue its like new. But the truth is, If you played halo 1 everyday all the time then halo 3 would seem better.


And another thing. You say how crapy halo 2 and 3 are but you obvously bought the games and play them. So they had to be good if you play them and are a big enough fan to be in this forum.
I sence some trolling.
well said!!

  • 09.14.2009 5:58 PM PDT

Halo 1 isnt stupid, ill agree halo 3 is better and the original poster is kinda confused right now.
I think what these people are asking for is more original things in halo. Im satisfied though.

  • 09.14.2009 6:04 PM PDT

@BIGENERENT or w/e the name is.

We're the out of date losers playing it? If that's true, then you're the new loser that hopped on the bandwagon once H3 came out cause of better graphics. H1 is what made the series, everything was in balance, it was pure goodness. Weapons could beat each other, maps were great, and H2 built on that. It was like H1.75, with online.

What i'd like, is a Halo 1 with not sucky multiplayer. If you play a game for graphics, which is no doubt what you like, that's incredibly stupid. Gameplay makes the game, not graphics, nothing else. You can say Halo 3 is better, but its just because of added glitter that make the game appeal to new players. They have to compete with things like Far Cry's map editor, computer games custom map makers, etc.
They had to compete with CSS, etc. Games as good as or better then Halo, with map makers, with mods, with modes to view past gameplay. Halo 3 is nothing more then the other Halo's, with more luck, more random things to go "WTF?" at, and more gimmicks to draw new players.

I played Halo 1 first because my friend had it and i liked it, i'd never eeven heard of H1 or 2. I bought them months later, and can honestly say that Halo 1 is the best of all 3, having played MLG lans on all of them recently. It's incredibly fun, and infinitely more skilled.

If they remade Halo 1, with better graphics, and and a good online system. It has the potential to be one of those best games on the Xbox360 lineup, and everyone who refuses to play it cause of "Bad Graphics" will be embarassed.

[Edited on 09.14.2009 6:10 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 6:08 PM PDT

Posted by: FFSalt
@BIGENERENT or w/e the name is.

We're the out of date losers playing it? If that's true, then you're the new loser that hopped on the bandwagon once H3 came out cause of better graphics. H1 is what made the series, everything was in balance, it was pure goodness. Weapons could beat each other, maps were great, and H2 built on that. It was like H1.75, with online.

What i'd like, is a Halo 1 with not sucky multiplayer. If you play a game for graphics, which is no doubt what you like, that's incredibly stupid. Gameplay makes the game, not graphics, nothing else. You can say Halo 3 is better, but its just because of added glitter that make the game appeal to new players. They have to compete with things like Far Cry's map editor, computer games custom map makers, etc.
They had to compete with CSS, etc. Games as good as or better then Halo, with map makers, with mods, with modes to view past gameplay. Halo 3 is nothing more then the other Halo's, with more luck, more random things to go "WTF?" at, and more gimmicks to draw new players.

I played Halo 1 first because my friend had it and i liked it, i'd never eeven heard of H1 or 2. I bought them months later, and can honestly say that Halo 1 is the best of all 3, having played MLG lans on all of them recently. It's incredibly fun, and infinitely more skilled.

If they remade Halo 1, with better graphics, and and a good online system. It has the potential to be one of those best games on the Xbox360 lineup, and everyone who refuses to play it cause of "Bad Graphics" will be embarassed.


I did not even bother reading your post after the first few lines, I never said halo 1 was bad, I never said you were all losers. I play halo 1 still on my computer all the time. I have played from the start. I am calling the people that cant accept change losers. The onse that come on this forum and say how halo 2 and 3 are terrible and halo 1 was so much better and whatever. Your an idiot if you think I was saying halo 1 was bad.

  • 09.14.2009 6:12 PM PDT

Posted by: FFSalt
@BIGENERENT or w/e the name is.

We're the out of date losers playing it? If that's true, then you're the new loser that hopped on the bandwagon once H3 came out cause of better graphics. H1 is what made the series, everything was in balance, it was pure goodness. Weapons could beat each other, maps were great, and H2 built on that. It was like H1.75, with online.

What i'd like, is a Halo 1 with not sucky multiplayer. If you play a game for graphics, which is no doubt what you like, that's incredibly stupid. Gameplay makes the game, not graphics, nothing else. You can say Halo 3 is better, but its just because of added glitter that make the game appeal to new players. They have to compete with things like Far Cry's map editor, computer games custom map makers, etc.
They had to compete with CSS, etc. Games as good as or better then Halo, with map makers, with mods, with modes to view past gameplay. Halo 3 is nothing more then the other Halo's, with more luck, more random things to go "WTF?" at, and more gimmicks to draw new players.

I played Halo 1 first because my friend had it and i liked it, i'd never eeven heard of H1 or 2. I bought them months later, and can honestly say that Halo 1 is the best of all 3, having played MLG lans on all of them recently. It's incredibly fun, and infinitely more skilled.

If they remade Halo 1, with better graphics, and and a good online system. It has the potential to be one of those best games on the Xbox360 lineup, and everyone who refuses to play it cause of "Bad Graphics" will be embarassed.


I agree with you when you say graphics aren't important, but i don't like you are all talking -blam!- about halo 3. Did you all forget it's the best rated first person shooter out there. I do think halo 1 is great and halo 3 might have drifted a little too far away from it, but drifting away brought in new features like forge, which i use more than anything else.
If halo 3 was the samething as halo 1 but with better graphics and online, i doubt it would be better. im sorry.

  • 09.14.2009 6:13 PM PDT

Again @ BIGENERENT

Are you serious? Go read it. You called people that want the remake who still play Halo 1 "out of date losers". That's out of context, in context, "so they don't feel like out of date losers playing it".

You're an idiot, and you just proved it by ignoring your previous statement. People that played Halo 1 first are biased to that game. I played Halo 3 before i even knew about Halo 2 or 1, i'd never heard of them. To me, 2 & 1 are much better then 3, any day of the week. It's all
gimmicks.

Don't call me an idiot if you don't remember what you just said.

[Edited on 09.14.2009 6:18 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 6:17 PM PDT

Dont underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

Posted by: RELLIK PIR
Halo Combat evolved about 50 awards Awards

Halo 2 34 awards More awards

Halo 3. I couldn't find a whole lot of anything. I saw 1 for forge that looked legit . I saw one as Game of the year but it wasn't really a year it was july 31 to july31 and COD4 won best multi-player at the same time and multiplayer is the only good thing about Halo 3 so that just seems dumb.

If I am missing something please build me a list of Halo 3s awards. Because everything I see tells me it just rode on the name of HALO which has a huge community which among games with big followings the game stays big no matter what just because of the social aspect.

Starcraft is over 10 years old and still has a huge following. So to give any credit to Halo 2 and 3 for simply growing off the original that made a name out of HALO is dumb.

No matter what you think it is pretty clear that these series mostly grows from reaching critical mass in HCE and growth spawned by console growth.. Hopefully REACH changes that but we wont know for while.

  • 09.14.2009 6:20 PM PDT

Posted by: FFSalt
Again @ BIGENERENT

Don't call me an idiot if you don't remember what you just said.


You know what. I just read what I said again. and I said so people dont FEEL like out of date losers playing it.

There is a key word there and that is FEEL. If I play halo 1 I think it is out of date, Dose that change how good the game is? No. How about you get all the words of my post before you call me and idiot.

I dont understand why you find my post offencive? Do you feel I was calling you a loser? Or are you just one of those people that want halo 1 remade? To be honest it is a damn web forum and I really didn't put that much thought into my post becasue it is really not important and is a way to kill time. Aparently you take everything said on this forum to heart though....

[Edited on 09.14.2009 6:27 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 6:21 PM PDT

wtf is wrong with you guys

fine halo 3 is horrible

  • 09.14.2009 6:24 PM PDT

nathanrennard.com

Posted by: Monkeyjoe78
halo 1 won awards because it was original, do you honestly think that if halo 3 and halo 1 were to come out at the same time halo 1 more get more awards than halo 3?


Exactly! I don't see why people can't see that. That's why I'm hoping for some innovation and originality in gameplay with Halo: Reach. Something that will knock our socks off. The thing is there will be people who are so stuck on original Halo that they will not support the new originality. They will have to learn all over again in a sense, and they hate that because they've spent so many hours at becoming so good and reached such high levels that they don't want to be at equal level with other players. Then the bagging on bungie will begin from these people.

But, I hope Bungie is willing to take a risk and put there heart into this development and produce something as original as Halo: CE was. This is the only way Bungie can stay on top of an ever advancing and evolving industry. If they don't do it another game company will... and this is the way Halo will end.

[Edited on 09.14.2009 6:26 PM PDT]

  • 09.14.2009 6:24 PM PDT

Somebody remind me again.....how much competition did Halo CE have compared to Halo 3?
I mean, how many other great games were released around CE's release compared to Halo 3's?


  • 09.15.2009 8:16 PM PDT