Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Possible Evidence that Time Travel theory is indeed FALSE!
  • Subject: Possible Evidence that Time Travel theory is indeed FALSE!
Subject: Possible Evidence that Time Travel theory is indeed FALSE!

The device has been modified....

A while ago I remember watching an interview on Inside Xbox where Major Nelson was interviewing Frank O'Connor regarding Halo Legends. This interview shows on the tv in the background Cortana with her hands pressed up against a cyro-chamber containing a spartan. I have noticed that there are many theories on this forum regarding the Halo 3 Legendary Ending and Halo: Reach. I am hoping that this may clear things up.

Recently I managed to find the interview on YouTube (Follow link to watch interview). Now at the beginning of the interview you'll notice the images in question on the television behind him. So this has led me to believe that the Mystery of the Halo 3 Legendary ending will infact be answered on Halo: Legends... not Halo: Reach.

Note that this is only my opinion backed up with certain evidence people are still allowed to believe the time travel theory if they so please. Also if this has been posted before then sorry I did not see any threads on the searchbar.

Picture links:

Proof Part 1
Proof Part 2

  • 09.18.2009 4:46 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

you mean, apart from these facts :
confirmed to be a prequel
time traveling would annihilate the storyline
time traveling would be the stupidest move to do in a video game, even worse than halo 2 ending

anybody above 12 can tell it won't have time travel of any kind of sort.

  • 09.18.2009 4:49 AM PDT

The device has been modified....

Posted by: z0rgy
you mean, apart from these facts :
confirmed to be a prequel
time traveling would annihilate the storyline
time traveling would be the stupidest move to do in a video game, even worse than halo 2 ending

anybody above 12 can tell it won't have time travel of any kind of sort.


Pretty much yeh lol

  • 09.18.2009 4:50 AM PDT

Rock + Metal = Life
Simple math

Posted by: z0rgy
you mean, apart from these facts :
confirmed to be a prequel
time traveling would annihilate the storyline
time traveling would be the stupidest move to do in a video game, even worse than halo 2 ending

anybody above 12 can tell it won't have time travel of any kind of sort.
Sorry for my lack of english but with prequel you mean tah Halo: Reach will be about things before Halo 3?

  • 09.18.2009 4:54 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Mythic Member

Proud frenchie, elite fan, anthro artist not hellbent on yiff convention/pics/whatever, mature and intelligent forum guy, 4chaner, halo 2 lover and halo 3 hater.

but hey nice find :p more evidence never hurts.

  • 09.18.2009 4:54 AM PDT

Armor Lock isn't overpowered. You just suck at Reach :)

Reach isn't bad, you're just a BK :)

For my gamertag, look up "Ghoulishtie"

Posted by: Halo Spartan 27
Posted by: z0rgy
you mean, apart from these facts :
confirmed to be a prequel
time traveling would annihilate the storyline
time traveling would be the stupidest move to do in a video game, even worse than halo 2 ending

anybody above 12 can tell it won't have time travel of any kind of sort.
Sorry for my lack of english but with prequel you mean tah Halo: Reach will be about things before Halo 3?


He means its Pre-Halo, as in before Halo 1. (Before masterchief found the first halo ring)

And yes, time travel is stupid. I dont even know why those time travel theory threads are still going strong.

  • 09.18.2009 5:04 AM PDT

The device has been modified....

And yes, time travel is stupid. I dont even know why those time travel theory threads are still going strong.

Yeah, Im hoping that this evidence might shed some light

  • 09.19.2009 4:23 AM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Or, hopefully, it's concept art for Halo 4. An anime? In my Halo 4? Not likely.

  • 09.19.2009 4:53 AM PDT
  • gamertag: Zereta
  • user homepage:

Been proven false since June 2nd 2009.

  • 09.19.2009 5:18 AM PDT

Time travel would not be a BAD plot line, Bungie however missed that train with how Halo 3 ended.

See in Halo 1 343, makes a comment about the MC already lighting the Halo rings.

Bungie ultimately in Halo 3 decided to not go that way, than again Bungie might not do to many more Halo games, but Msoft will.

Remember 343.

If done RIGHT it has the potential to be good. BUT in Reach it would be a bad move.

What I would like to see is, them stick as close to the book as they can story wise as they possibly can, the book was grate, yes I get there are just things they could not do, but some of it should not be touched. EVER.

And if this turns into a Halo Wars remake, told as an FPS than Ill be mad. LOL.

  • 09.19.2009 6:18 AM PDT