- robyslobbynobby
- |
- Senior Member
- gamertag: S7DZ
- user homepage:
I.W.H.B.Y.D.B.T.D.B.M.O.T.F.
Another thing too, I'm not sure if this was mentioned but the SPARTANS are just getting weaker and weaker. IIs were the peak then IIIs were basically bread to die and not survive. Now I hear rumors of IVs who are made up of adult volunteers? Come on Humanity lets learn from out mistakes.
Posted by: RoundHammer117
A somewhat serious addition to a well written, humorous and sarcastic jibe. Provided a good laugh, my compliments Petarded!
In all honesty, I would rather have the M4 I used in iraq and afghanistan than employ any of what the game designers, in all seriousness, call infantry small arms.
Those players who are Veterans generally have an unfavorable opinion of games whose designers do not do even basic research on the subject of firearms.
7.62x51mm NATO, a cartridge first selected in 1954, is the standard in the 26th century?
Just one of these rounds can liquify a human head at 800 meters and beyond, yet it cannot kill a pudgy, asthmatic alien munchkin at point-blank range?
Really Bungie . . .?
This "Two Mags: One Kill" nonsense, even in Halo: Reach, on the big purple lizards provides no end of frustration.
To say nothing of multi-player.
That, or the UNSC Corps of Logistics needs to procure cartridges employing ACTUAL bullets.
Not like Bungie cares . . . they got the money already.
Good thing I never paid for my copy of Reach . . .
Lol it's not supposed to be a realistic game the weapons are situation based. That's why they have 2 rifles instead of 1 with a rate of fire switch.....
[Edited on 12.24.2011 1:28 PM PST]