Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Campaign
  • Subject: Campaign
Subject: Campaign

Anyone else believe that the campaign for Halo:Reach would be a bit insubstantial at best, as there was only one real battle in Reach timeline, The Battle of Reach. Even if told from the perspectives of Red and Blue teams, it would still need a lot of fluff, perhaps even losing canon to add a rich solo experience. Anyone have any thoughts as to how the campaign may play out?

  • 09.29.2009 7:10 PM PDT

I'm-A-Chargin My LAZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

heres an idea that i had. Did you ever see the movie vantage point, seeing the same event from different vantage points and points of view? How bout that to take up some time in campain. The battle of reach from a marine/ODST, a spartan, Buck, Sgt.Johnson, a brute, an elite, one of the spartans, Sgt.Johnson, and if you really strech this idea to the limit, you could see the point of view of the prophet, and not exactly play as him, but play with him, and that goes the same for the leader of the human army (i think its lord hood)

  • 09.29.2009 7:16 PM PDT

Ya lord hood is an admiral. But even with the different perspectives, the game would get a bit repetitive, especially if you play the same battles. I was thinking that perhaps the game could move like Halo 2 did wit the Arbiter and the Master Chief. Though Halo 2 had a god awful campaign...

  • 09.29.2009 7:25 PM PDT