Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: firefight v.s. the flood
  • Subject: firefight v.s. the flood
Subject: firefight v.s. the flood

Moderator Notice: This user has been blacklisted from this forum. Until the user is removed from the blacklist, all posts this user has made have been hidden, and all topics created by this user have been censored.
  • 10.01.2009 6:49 PM PDT

It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.

Posted by: chickenlittle
Cheeto is the only one among you that doesn't suck.

If you're bored already, then don't worry about the next firefight, as you will be bored just as quickly with that as you were with this one. Flood are no different than the Covenant.

  • 10.01.2009 6:52 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

sorry dude but highly doubtful. flood werent discovered until halo 1. reach is a prequel.

  • 10.01.2009 6:53 PM PDT

Brutes and Elites?...

  • 10.01.2009 6:58 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

firefight is cool but id rather if they kept that exclusive to ODST. if they are doing something special for multiplayer, they should make a new gametype. just like how firefight was new to us last week and we played it for the first time it was fun. I havent played it much so its still just as entertaining to me. If bungie makes multiplayer in reach they should make something new.

  • 10.01.2009 7:02 PM PDT

BYAHH

yes and no.... I would like to see them incorporated but I dont want to end up fighting a million annoying flood. They are just so dumb and frustrating sometimes.

  • 10.01.2009 7:08 PM PDT

what if this game is like odst where it drags on from reach to halo ce when they discover the flood

  • 10.01.2009 7:32 PM PDT