Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [4 votes]: Should Reach be different from classic Halo?
  • Poll [4 votes]: Should Reach be different from classic Halo?
Subject: Should Reach be different from classic Halo?

if you have any questions about halo i am one of the few people on this site who will gladly help you. Even though this account has been active for only a year, my past accounts go all the way back to 2002.

Poll: Should Reach be different from classic Halo?  [closed]
Yes it should:  50%
(2 Votes)
No it should not:  0%
(0 Votes)
[other] state below:  50%
(2 Votes)
Total Votes: 4

now that Halo 3 is over, Bungie can try new things within the halo genre and not be constricted by the necessity to reproduce that Halo 1 feel. Look at ODST as proof here, Bungie wants to move away from the classic gameplay, why wouldnt you want to improve? of course it will still feel like halo, but do you think Reach should do something different (classes, cover system, anything like that just something new)

  • 10.02.2009 8:16 PM PDT

Dom ~ Thread Killer

Other.

I think Bungie should combine elements from the other 4 Halo games.

  • 10.02.2009 8:26 PM PDT

if you have any questions about halo i am one of the few people on this site who will gladly help you. Even though this account has been active for only a year, my past accounts go all the way back to 2002.

Posted by: DC Dominus
Other.

I think Bungie should combine elements from the other 4 Halo games.

I would say ODST combined things from the three previous games, and i also would say it is different because its much more tactical

  • 10.02.2009 8:28 PM PDT