- Ksychutrya
- |
- Noble Member
93% of statistics are lies. Formerly Xfire Grunt. Unfortunately, you can't change the WLID for your BNET account, so I had to create an alternate account. My other WLID was spam city (and it was my e-mail account too).
Lets go back to the Halo 2 days when Halo 2 came out. Halo 2 has better graphics then many Xbox 360 games (low budget titles now, non AAA titles before 2007).
Halo 3 is not similar. Halo 3 was not a graphical masterpiece. It was good, but not great. It wasn't ridiculously good. It wasn't the best of its time like Halo 2.
After seeing the Uncharted 2 and Modern Warfare 2 trailers, I am hoping for Bungie to beat the ridiculously good competition and make something like Halo2 graphically for its time. Something with graphics so good its better then games that come out in 2013 that are no top of the line. I mean Modern Warfare 2 is ridiculously good looking, and if Halo:Reach can beat that it would be great.
Everybody is going to say "graphics don't matter, gameplay does". All right, then why do people spend $2500 on HDTVs and $30 on Blu-Rays? Graphics make the experience better. Good graphics is not a replacement for gameplay. But too have one of the best experiences ever, graphics are important ESPECIALLY for SINGLE PLAYER. Single player graphics are 3* more important then multi-player graphics. Movies are more immersive, games as well when they look photo-realisitic.
So please Bungie, have graphical innovation, not graphical evolution like Halo 3. Halo 3 is an evolved version of Halo 2, which only looks good because Halo 2 was so damn good (as evidenced by the fact that Halo 3 looks very similar and got 9.5 graphical ratings on the Xbox 360, the next generation.