Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: No class based multiplayer protest list
  • Subject: No class based multiplayer protest list
Subject: No class based multiplayer protest list

Rock + Metal = Life
Simple math

I know it isn't for sure if the game will be classbased but I don't like the idea at all. I hope Bungie will read this to make changes now when they have a chanse. If you are against the class based idea, sign your name here.

Halo Spartan 27

  • 10.05.2009 9:02 AM PDT

lol, online petitions always get taken seriously, so this is a great idea! /sarcasm/
I, for one hope it is class-based. Bungie needs to deviate from the standard formula by now...

[Edited on 10.05.2009 9:08 AM PDT]

  • 10.05.2009 9:07 AM PDT

the game has been in development for like two years now. if its class based then bungie is to deep into development to go back.

have you ever played a class based game before? unless you have dont form an oppinion about them.maybe you have played a few class based games and dont like them. in the case then play halo reach if its class based, it might actually be good.

  • 10.05.2009 9:10 AM PDT

Rock + Metal = Life
Simple math

Posted by: bat out of h3ll
the game has been in development for like two years now. if its class based then bungie is to deep into development to go back.

have you ever played a class based game before? unless you have dont form an oppinion about them.maybe you have played a few class based games and dont like them. in the case then play halo reach if its class based, it might actually be good.

Do you honostly think i don't have played class based games? I have played them (eg. CoD 4) and that *******!! besides, you can't play split screen on them (live)!

[Edited on 10.05.2009 9:16 AM PDT]

  • 10.05.2009 9:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Keep deez nades out'cho mouf!!

Class based multiplayer bites. Stick with what works. There's a reason has had such a strong following. Stick with what works. If they want to do a class based multiplayer then they should try that on their next project that is not halo related.

Bungie needs to stick to what's worked so far with some thing new brought to the table. Equipment for Halo 3 was a nice addition. Changed the game a little bit but didn't stray too far from its original concept.

I would just like to see new equipment, weapons, vehicles and lots more armor customization.

  • 10.05.2009 9:16 AM PDT

(>-^.^)> ( # )

Posted by: ILLAH
Class based multiplayer bites. Stick with what works. There's a reason has had such a strong following. Stick with what works. If they want to do a class based multiplayer then they should try that on their next project that is not halo related.

Bungie needs to stick to what's worked so far with some thing new brought to the table. Equipment for Halo 3 was a nice addition. Changed the game a little bit but didn't stray too far from its original concept.

I would just like to see new equipment, weapons, vehicles and lots more armor customization.


Its like telling T-Pain to stop singing in his robotic voice. If it works, don't fix something that isn't broken.

  • 10.05.2009 9:18 AM PDT

Posted by: Halo Spartan 27
Posted by: bat out of h3ll
the game has been in development for like two years now. if its class based then bungie is to deep into development to go back.

have you ever played a class based game before? unless you have dont form an oppinion about them.maybe you have played a few class based games and dont like them. in the case then play halo reach if its class based, it might actually be good.

Do you honostly think i don't have played class based games? I have played them (eg. CoD 4) and that *******!! besides, you can't play split screen on them (live)!


COD4 doesn't really count. Battlefield and team fortress are better examples of class-based games.

  • 10.05.2009 9:23 AM PDT

Rock + Metal = Life
Simple math

Ok, but i have played battlefield also. I don't think Bungie should go that far from Halo 3.

  • 10.05.2009 9:25 AM PDT