Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Really???
  • Subject: Really???
Subject: Really???

yea i know but acctually i think a sqaud based shooter aspect of the game i would go for... maybe not for multyplayer but campaing. i hate coop when 4 different people would hop skip in 12 differrent directions. i think squad commands markers that you can see dare i say it... helmet camaras... but really i like working with people who are tactichlly profeicent. i hate loose coop!!! no multiplayer doesnt have to be maybe an optional playlist for squadbased shooter aspects kinda like swat but a little more close knit. anyone catch my drift?

  • 10.06.2009 5:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

GT: Greg Is So Hot

Who said anything about Reach being a squad based shooter?

  • 10.06.2009 10:41 PM PDT

Posted by: Ushan
Because Muslims surgically implant organic bombs in their testicles, which in turn will be injected into women during sex, which will grow into BABY BOMBS!

Posted by: Monkeylizard
Who said anything about Reach being a squad based shooter?


Joseph Staten said that it would have squad based aspects but would not be squad based like Rainbow 6 Vegas.

  • 10.06.2009 11:07 PM PDT

Posted by: Tucker 051
Posted by: Monkeylizard
Who said anything about Reach being a squad based shooter?


Joseph Staten said that it would have squad based aspects but would not be squad based like Rainbow 6 Vegas.

I believe the words he chose were something along the lines of "It feels like a squad based shooter but without the added baggage of a squad based shooter."

  • 10.06.2009 11:13 PM PDT