- A1N2G3U4S
- |
- Honorable Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: DK daze
Dude I don't care and my grammer is perfect.I used "Big", as you recall it to mak is specific."to not do...",is incorrect beause "do" is present tense/perfect(or future) when it was a past tense.
Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: a few papercuts
Posted by: Hylebos
Nobody uses the normal pistol. We can just take that out too. "Nobody" is going to miss it. Same for territories. Screw the people who like rocket race, nobody likes default territories, so that gametype has to go too. I don't like to use the sniper rifle very often either, and I have some friends that also don't like to use the sniper rifle veyr often so we can take that out as well. Because our small sampling *must* represent the entire Halo community.
Why would you take away a playing style that some people use? What benefit would it have? Absolutely none. "I don't like it or use it so it has to go" is not a valid reason for getting rid of dual wielding.
well possibly because it could free up those weapons so they could be effective without having to dual wield them? ODST did it beautifully
You have a problem.
You have a cut on my arm.
It could get infected.
You could get sick.
The obvious solution is to cut off your arm.
...Seems a bit drastic yes? There are ways to balance the dual wielding weapons so they can be useful on their own and useful while dual wielded. Getting rid of dual wielding to accomplish the former option might get the job done, but there is going to be a whole lot of unnecessary blood shed and sacrifice.Wait... I didn't need to cut of by arm? -blam!-!