Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Has Bungie been slack on campaign lately.
  • Subject: Has Bungie been slack on campaign lately.
Subject: Has Bungie been slack on campaign lately.
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Have they?

  • 10.07.2009 8:51 AM PDT

i dont know. they have only made three halo games so theres not that many of them to tell if its a trend

  • 10.07.2009 8:53 AM PDT

http://www.halo-forum.com

I dont think so.

  • 10.07.2009 8:54 AM PDT

...

Yeap, to many gift baskets from Microsoft have made them campaign lazy. Cmon Bungie, step it up!!

  • 10.07.2009 8:57 AM PDT

I don't think they've been lazy on the campaign side of things. I think it was just time constraints for Halo 2's campaign which caused it to be crap. Halo 3's was much better and felt more like Halo:CE. Although, I do think they need to ramp it up a lot for Reach's campaign. I want it to be epic.

  • 10.07.2009 9:22 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

READ:

Sending me a group invite or some kind of other pointless, time wasting advert gets you blocked. Don't bother wasting your time. kthnxbai

As of ODST + Halo 3 my main criticism with the campaign is length. I completed ODST Solo Legendary in about 5 - 6 hours - there was a lot of stuff that they could have expanded upon too.

  • 10.07.2009 9:24 AM PDT

Eh?

-blam!- No. What would give you that idea?

Halo CE was great

Halo 2 was ok

Halo 3 was amazing

ODST was also amazing

  • 10.07.2009 9:35 AM PDT

Signatures are for squares.

Posted by: MLG Dmega
-blam!- No. What would give you that idea?

Halo CE was the best

Halo 2 was great for the story, although the levels themselves were lacking

Halo 3 was poor compared to Halo 1 and 2, but still not bad.

ODST was nearly as good as Halo CE.



Fixed.

[Edited on 10.07.2009 10:00 AM PDT]

  • 10.07.2009 10:00 AM PDT