Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo 2 ways??
  • Subject: Halo 2 ways??
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Halo 2 ways??

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Take out the 'shot leading' then everyone is happy (:

For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

[Edited on 10.07.2009 12:49 PM PDT]

  • 10.07.2009 12:35 PM PDT

go play team spelling

im sorry, come again?

  • 10.07.2009 12:36 PM PDT

It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.

Posted by: chickenlittle
Cheeto is the only one among you that doesn't suck.

Posted by: winger3000
im sorry, come again?

I believe he is referring to how, in Halo 2, you could fire a shot at their head, and it would hit, no matter what. If they are moving? No problem. Basically, take out any realism to the combat aspect.

  • 10.07.2009 12:40 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

cheeto666

if you want to talk about realism the MA5 has a mussel velocity 850m/s, and the battle rife cant work. there is not enough room the the bolt to cycle

  • 10.07.2009 12:43 PM PDT

My troll sense is tingling.

Posted by: Cheeto666
Posted by: winger3000
im sorry, come again?

I believe he is referring to how, in Halo 2, you could fire a shot at their head, and it would hit, no matter what. If they are moving? No problem. Basically, take out any realism to the combat aspect.

Right... that's just dumb.

  • 10.07.2009 12:44 PM PDT

go play team spelling

Posted by: Cheeto666
Posted by: winger3000
im sorry, come again?

I believe he is referring to how, in Halo 2, you could fire a shot at their head, and it would hit, no matter what. If they are moving? No problem. Basically, take out any realism to the combat aspect.
you answered my question, and gave my reply. thank you good sir!

  • 10.07.2009 12:47 PM PDT

It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.

Posted by: chickenlittle
Cheeto is the only one among you that doesn't suck.

Posted by: Czar_CJ_Elm
cheeto666

the battle rife cant work. there is not enough room the the bolt to cycle

Wrong. We don't know anything about how weapons work in the 26th century. I'm pretty sure that few advances would have come through to make things work just fine. I'm saying that if you fire at a small moving target, like a Spartan's head, you'll need to lead your shots.

  • 10.07.2009 12:48 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

  • 10.07.2009 12:51 PM PDT

LIVE GT: Asian Inferno
Also go by: AsiansOnFire, SpartansOnFire, and Cad.
Grunts 'R' Us:
Website: http://www.gruntsrus.com
Ech0 Productions:
Website: http://www.ech0productions.echoz.com
"Kat can't die! She has nine lives! =)" - Asian Inferno

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

You just repeated your orignal post.

  • 10.07.2009 1:00 PM PDT

"Dear Humanity; we regret being alien bastards. We regret coming to Earth. And we most definitely regret that the Corps just blew up our raggedy-ass fleet!"
—Avery J. Johnson
click it you know you want to

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

I think you got your games mixed up..... Really, you did. In H2, you actually needed to lead your shots (though most of the time you where in close quaters, so you really never had too) and in H3, you took a shot at the guus face and you hit, always. In H:CE, you really needed to lead your shots, the guns were realistic then, but not anymore.

  • 10.07.2009 1:05 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Posted by: Dustinw1
Posted by: IcanHazSausage
For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

I think you got your games mixed up..... Really, you did. In H2, you actually needed to lead your shots (though most of the time you where in close quaters, so you really never had too) and in H3, you took a shot at the guus face and you hit, always. In H:CE, you really needed to lead your shots, the guns were realistic then, but not anymore.


What the hell are you on about?!

You have the lead your shots on Halo 3. On Halo 2, you just shot and you hit. Go play halo 2!!

  • 10.07.2009 1:47 PM PDT

It is harder to lead shots because you still have to keep the retical within a space the size of the spartans head to get a head shot. however, since this space is actually in front of the moving target and not on top of the moving target there is no auto aim not to mension you have to calculate distance and tragectory and you can't see the spot where you need to aim. explain to me how leading your shots is easier than not leading them.

  • 10.07.2009 1:51 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Because when you lead the shot, you can either shoot infront to hit your enemy, or you can still shoot where they are, but wont be as effective. When you dont lead you shots, you HAVE to hit them.

When someone is jumping about all over the place, and you have a BR and trying to shoot them. If you have a messy aim, then its fine because you can either hit them, and shoot in front (2 chances if you know what i mean). Unlike the fact you cant lead your shots and you have to get them with EVERY shot.

Leading your shots - 2 chances to kill your enemy

Not leading your shots - 1 chance to kill your enemy

  • 10.07.2009 2:41 PM PDT

does anyone else see the flaw in this? im in philosophy class and need to pay attention so i can't refute this.

  • 10.07.2009 2:47 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Heroic Member

www.eevince.com
www.polark.deviantart.com

____________________________

They thought they were funny; however, they didn't know they were talking to a peanut farmer from Georgia who knows the value of a peanut.

this is stupid bungie just needs to stick with the realistic game play by leading your shots witch takes more skill by the way.

[Edited on 10.07.2009 2:50 PM PDT]

  • 10.07.2009 2:50 PM PDT

sup

I agree 100%. They changed it because host had a disadvantage this way. Its better to have 1 person have a disadvantage than to have everyone else besides that one person.

  • 10.07.2009 3:07 PM PDT

I hunt for the Prophet of Contentment, the San 'Shyumm that murdered my son, and stole his birthright, his Energy Sword. They call our species Heretics. They claim to all that our tongues sting, our words a vile poison that feeds on the unworthy. I have seen the true face of Heresy. The head of a gallant warrior lay on the ground. His neck scorched and blistered, scarred by his own blade. I shall retrieve the weapon, and drive it through that bastard's heart! Punishment for his sins is nigh.

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
Take out the 'shot leading' then everyone is happy (:

For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

Leading takes alot more skill and is more realistic. When you lead you have to judge alot of things, how they are moving, if they will stop or change direction. How far they are? How fast your bullets travel, how many shots from your BR will hit in one burst?

It makes a player take alot more into account when lining up a shot, and adds skill to the game.

  • 10.07.2009 3:09 PM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"

Shot leading at range is the best way to go, regardless of which title did what. Being able to just shoot and hit a moving target right down the sights is retarded.

  • 10.07.2009 3:12 PM PDT

Group invites will be treated very poorly because the Care Package is empty.

__/
|__|

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
Take out the 'shot leading' then everyone is happy (:

For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.


Do you realise how retarded this sounds?

It does not take more skill to hover your reticule over the target than leading your shots.

  • 10.07.2009 3:16 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Well i personally thought that, having a one on one BR fight on halo 2, was ALOT more challenging then a one on one, on Halo 3.

  • 10.07.2009 3:17 PM PDT

"Dear Humanity; we regret being alien bastards. We regret coming to Earth. And we most definitely regret that the Corps just blew up our raggedy-ass fleet!"
—Avery J. Johnson
click it you know you want to

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
Posted by: Dustinw1
Posted by: IcanHazSausage
For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

I think you got your games mixed up..... Really, you did. In H2, you actually needed to lead your shots (though most of the time you where in close quaters, so you really never had too) and in H3, you took a shot at the guus face and you hit, always. In H:CE, you really needed to lead your shots, the guns were realistic then, but not anymore.


What the hell are you on about?!

You have the lead your shots on Halo 3. On Halo 2, you just shot and you hit. Go play halo 2!!

I have, and i do play it. I know the aiming mechanics for all four halo's, and i also know that in H3, you dont need to lead the shots because the shots hit the target instantly. in H2, you needed to aim ahead of your target, otherwise, you would miss. but, the better question is, Have you played halo 2? or have you just had a mistake on which aiming mechanics affect which game? I realize that we are human, and that we make mistakes, but in H2, you tended to not lead the shot because all the maps where relativly small, save coagulation.

  • 10.07.2009 3:22 PM PDT

Signatures are for squares.

Posted by: SweetTRIX
Shot leading at range is the best way to go, regardless of which title did what. Being able to just shoot and hit a moving target right down the sights is retarded.

  • 10.07.2009 3:25 PM PDT

Umm, this was in 1 and 2, they took just about most of it out in halo 3.

If you played halo 1, then you would now you had to lead shots. In halo 3, if your sniper crosshairs are on his head, you fire, he's dead.

  • 10.07.2009 3:32 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Dustinw1
Posted by: IcanHazSausage

Posted by: Dustinw1

Posted by: IcanHazSausage
For people who dont knwo what im on about. In Halo 3, you have to lead to shot. This means, when an enemy is running, you must shoot AHEAD of them to hurt them.

In Halo 2, you did not have to do this. All you had to do was shoot them in the face. TBH i think this requires more skill as you have to keep the reticle on your target as they are moving.

I think you got your games mixed up..... Really, you did. In H2, you actually needed to lead your shots (though most of the time you where in close quaters, so you really never had too) and in H3, you took a shot at the guus face and you hit, always. In H:CE, you really needed to lead your shots, the guns were realistic then, but not anymore.



What the hell are you on about?!

You have the lead your shots on Halo 3. On Halo 2, you just shot and you hit. Go play halo 2!!

I have, and i do play it. I know the aiming mechanics for all four halo's, and i also know that in H3, you dont need to lead the shots because the shots hit the target instantly. in H2, you needed to aim ahead of your target, otherwise, you would miss. but, the better question is, Have you played halo 2? or have you just had a mistake on which aiming mechanics affect which game? I realize that we are human, and that we make mistakes, but in H2, you tended to not lead the shot because all the maps where relativly small, save coagulation.



What the hell are you on about?!? In Halo 2 you DIDNT have to lead your shots! In Halo 3 you DO!

[Edited on 10.07.2009 4:11 PM PDT]

  • 10.07.2009 4:10 PM PDT

IcanHazSausage

I sell Graphic Designs.

If interested, contact me.

Dustinw1 you really dont know what your talking about. Go and Google it! or prehaps find out for yourself...Go and PLAY Halo 2 and use the BR and find out for yourself. YOU DO NOT NEED TO LEAD YOUR SHOTS IN HALO 2!

  • 10.07.2009 4:16 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2