Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [33 votes]: Do you think that Blood Gulch should be in Reach?
  • Poll [33 votes]: Do you think that Blood Gulch should be in Reach?
Subject: Do you think that Blood Gulch should be in Reach?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

ravoflaven

Poll: Do you think that Blood Gulch should be in Reach?  [closed]
Yes:  79%
(26 Votes)
No:  6%
(2 Votes)
Don't Care:  9%
(3 Votes)
As long as there are new maps to:  6%
(2 Votes)
Total Votes: 33

Blood Gulch is a classic map that should have already made a new appearance. Many fun aspects were in this map, including a small lake, two bases, and a mountain that you can partially climb. I for one am suprised that some form of Blood Gulch hasn't made an appearance in the newest games. And for those of you who don't already know, RedVsBlue was started there, and it became a hilarious series that has over 100 episodes. Vote wehther or not you want Blood Gulch back.

  • 10.08.2009 2:18 PM PDT

Yeah. I'm back. Whatcha gonna do about it?

It'd be great: assuming that Reach is the same gaming format as ODST and Halo 3.

If the game is going to be one of those open-world games, however, I could see Blood Gulch as an area you can travel to, but not a 'map' as you think of it.

Also, since it's Reach, it won't be called 'Blood Gulch' and probably will look very much different from what people remember.

  • 10.08.2009 2:22 PM PDT

http://i9.tinypic.com/4z3w3eh.jpg ---- lolown.

No, Blood Gulch has gotten it's time to shine.
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.

Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?

  • 10.08.2009 2:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: D3V0NST8R
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.


You're opinion. I think it was one of the best maps in the series.


Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?


Valhalla =/= Blood Gulch. Get it in your heads

  • 10.08.2009 3:29 PM PDT

http://i9.tinypic.com/4z3w3eh.jpg ---- lolown.

Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.


You're opinion. I think it was one of the best maps in the series.


Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?


Valhalla =/= Blood Gulch. Get it in your heads


Sir, you do realize that Valhalla plays out pretty much exactly the same, right? The only difference here is Mancannons and the Anti-Spawncamp hill which are actually great replacements for tank spawn camping and teleporters.

Also, I'm opinion? Opinion is not a physical being. I believe the term you're looking for is "Your" and not "You're."

[Edited on 10.08.2009 3:31 PM PDT]

  • 10.08.2009 3:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.


You're opinion. I think it was one of the best maps in the series.


Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?


Valhalla =/= Blood Gulch. Get it in your heads


Sir, you do realize that Valhalla plays out pretty much exactly the same, right? The only difference here is Mancannons and the Anti-Spawncamp hill which are actually great replacements for tank spawn camping and teleporters.


I disagree, once again. I think, if Bungie intended for Valhalla to become a remake of BG, they would not have added that Bloody Hill. It's stupid, and it makes the game play completely different.

It's to difficult to even attempt to drive Vehciles, and BG was best known for it's good sniper battles. In BG, you had to work as a team for Objective games. In Valhalla, just control the hill.

  • 10.08.2009 3:33 PM PDT

404 error please try again later.

Sure
As long as i have me sniper and BR i`m happy

  • 10.08.2009 3:33 PM PDT

http://i9.tinypic.com/4z3w3eh.jpg ---- lolown.

Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.


You're opinion. I think it was one of the best maps in the series.


Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?


Valhalla =/= Blood Gulch. Get it in your heads


Sir, you do realize that Valhalla plays out pretty much exactly the same, right? The only difference here is Mancannons and the Anti-Spawncamp hill which are actually great replacements for tank spawn camping and teleporters.


I disagree, once again. I think, if Bungie intended for Valhalla to become a remake of BG, they would not have added that Bloody Hill. It's stupid, and it makes the game play completely different.

It's to difficult to even attempt to drive Vehciles, and BG was best known for it's good sniper battles. In BG, you had to work as a team for Objective games. In Valhalla, just control the hill.


Valhalla is actually superior to Blood Gulch, I was sick of being spawncamped by noobs who just sit back at their base in a Scorpion waiting for someone to spawn, and kill them. It killed the fun of Blood Gulch for me, so I avoided it forever more. Plus, they have Wraiths in Valhalla for a reason. So you can actually shoot over the hill.

  • 10.08.2009 3:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Posted by: MOB74656
Posted by: D3V0NST8R
We need NEW maps, not reincarnations of old maps that in all honesty SUCK.


You're opinion. I think it was one of the best maps in the series.


Posted by: D3V0NST8R
Plus, isn't Valhalla enough of a remake for you?


Valhalla =/= Blood Gulch. Get it in your heads


Sir, you do realize that Valhalla plays out pretty much exactly the same, right? The only difference here is Mancannons and the Anti-Spawncamp hill which are actually great replacements for tank spawn camping and teleporters.


I disagree, once again. I think, if Bungie intended for Valhalla to become a remake of BG, they would not have added that Bloody Hill. It's stupid, and it makes the game play completely different.

It's to difficult to even attempt to drive Vehciles, and BG was best known for it's good sniper battles. In BG, you had to work as a team for Objective games. In Valhalla, just control the hill.


Valhalla is actually superior to Blood Gulch, I was sick of being spawncamped by noobs who just sit back at their base in a Scorpion waiting for someone to spawn, and kill them. It killed the fun of Blood Gulch for me, so I avoided it forever more. Plus, they have Wraiths in Valhalla for a reason. So you can actually shoot over the hill.


Wraiths are very inaccurate, especially on Valhalla, because you can't see.

And on the Scoripion, why not just use the Scorpion back?

I saw Valhalla fell behind in comparison to BG.

  • 10.08.2009 3:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

ravoflaven

I agree with Bartoneye93, I never thought of it that way, but it would be cool to be able to visit it in an open world type game. Although, most of the game takes place on Reach... There probubly won't be any Blood Gulch. However, there might be a kind of prototype red and blue base, just to give the feel of Blood Gulch.

  • 10.09.2009 3:19 PM PDT

Only if it works.

  • 10.09.2009 3:20 PM PDT

Armor Lock isn't overpowered. You just suck at Reach :)

Reach isn't bad, you're just a BK :)

For my gamertag, look up "Ghoulishtie"

Do I think these topics are getting annoying?

Of course.

  • 10.09.2009 4:34 PM PDT