Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Awsome moves
  • Subject: Awsome moves
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Awsome moves
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
Ok, now you are just going over the top. "A backflip before throwing them"? Stop it.


You have clearly never heard of extreme case reasoning. Its where you exagerate on purpous to prove a certain point. In this case, I am exagerating your wants for "awesome moves" to show how silly it seems to me. Its a good tool to utilize to win your arguements, I suggest learning to use it.


You clearly know very little about the real world. A spin kick will generate more kenetic energy, and will result in a more powerfull blow than if you just punched someone.

I clearly know little about the real world and "kinetic" energy eh? Heres a little problem that you have overlooked however, if you are a spartan, and you can kill someone by punching them why waste the time doing a spinning kick to accomplish the same result?

[Warning: Following paragraph may contain a Extreme Case Reasoning. Continue Reading at your own risk.]
Its like trying to fish catch fish by using a pistol. Its more expensive, and doesn't really get you a better result than catching the fish using a rod.


As for the grenade-in-mouth thing, it was not meant to be flashy at all. It was meant to be Brutal.

Brutal for what reason? Does Master Chief hate the Covenant? Did they kill his wife and children? Did he set out on a personal vendetta to slaughter them all? No. Its all about motivation. He is simply a soldier, following orders to protect humanity. He doesn't have time to hate his enemies. He just wants to get the mission done as fast as possible. Thats what millitary training from the age of six does to a person. It creates efficient killers. So it would seem a bit odd to see a spartan all of a sudden doing these brutal things, and would make me scratch my head as the player, and destroys the suspension of disbelief that the game had maintained to that point.

Did I mention "spinning" a jackal around? No. What I said was this: Grab their arm, and rip it off. Simple


But in a battle of simplicity, just breaking their spine with a beatdown works, which is all that matters.


LOL...Just because you diddn't lose your family does not mean you cannot do brutal things on the battlefield. Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time. Also, Spartan's can't kill a Brute in a single punch, I don't think they can kill an Elite in a single punch either (Maybe they can, I'm not completely sure).
Watch this to the end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A6lojxvmy4

Moves such as "spin kicking" were not created to look fancy, they were created to be effective, and happen to look "fancy" in the proccess. Besides, it would be really dissapointing to see the same old walk, jump, melee gameplay that is 8 years old as I mentioned before. Things like this new combat system will enhance the Halo experience.

[Edited on 10.12.2009 4:16 PM PDT]

  • 10.12.2009 4:14 PM PDT

Posted by: Jonzx5
Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
Ok, now you are just going over the top. "A backflip before throwing them"? Stop it.


You have clearly never heard of extreme case reasoning. Its where you exagerate on purpous to prove a certain point. In this case, I am exagerating your wants for "awesome moves" to show how silly it seems to me. Its a good tool to utilize to win your arguements, I suggest learning to use it.


You clearly know very little about the real world. A spin kick will generate more kenetic energy, and will result in a more powerfull blow than if you just punched someone.

I clearly know little about the real world and "kinetic" energy eh? Heres a little problem that you have overlooked however, if you are a spartan, and you can kill someone by punching them why waste the time doing a spinning kick to accomplish the same result?

[Warning: Following paragraph may contain a Extreme Case Reasoning. Continue Reading at your own risk.]
Its like trying to fish catch fish by using a pistol. Its more expensive, and doesn't really get you a better result than catching the fish using a rod.


As for the grenade-in-mouth thing, it was not meant to be flashy at all. It was meant to be Brutal.

Brutal for what reason? Does Master Chief hate the Covenant? Did they kill his wife and children? Did he set out on a personal vendetta to slaughter them all? No. Its all about motivation. He is simply a soldier, following orders to protect humanity. He doesn't have time to hate his enemies. He just wants to get the mission done as fast as possible. Thats what millitary training from the age of six does to a person. It creates efficient killers. So it would seem a bit odd to see a spartan all of a sudden doing these brutal things, and would make me scratch my head as the player, and destroys the suspension of disbelief that the game had maintained to that point.

Did I mention "spinning" a jackal around? No. What I said was this: Grab their arm, and rip it off. Simple


But in a battle of simplicity, just breaking their spine with a beatdown works, which is all that matters.


LOL...Just because you diddn't lose your family does not mean you cannot do brutal things on the battlefield. Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time. Also, Spartan's can't kill a Brute in a single punch, I don't think they can kill an Elite in a single punch either (Maybe they can, I'm not completely sure).
Watch this to the end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A6lojxvmy4

Moves such as "spin kicking" were not created to look fancy, they were created to be effective, and happen to look "fancy" in the proccess. Besides, it would be really dissapointing to see the same old walk, jump, melee gameplay that is 8 years old as I mentioned before. Things like this new combat system will enhance the Halo experience.


Dude, just stop.

Gears of War has all this ridiculous, over the top summer blockbuster moves, because that's it's angle.

But, in actuality, it makes no sense. Why am I going to pick up a Grunt, rip of its mask, force a grenade into it's mouth, and then toss it into a group of enemies? I can just shoot the Grunt, throw a grenade, and BAM. Same result, but it doesn't look stupid.

Second of all, why the hell are the Spartans going to spin kick an Alien instead of shooting it in the face? They give them guns for a reason, you know.

And thirdly, Master Chief didn't "Rip Apart" ODST's with his bare hands, he killed one, and injured two. And that was on a wrestling mat, not in the middle of a battle.

  • 10.12.2009 4:27 PM PDT

I think that the best way to do neat moves is for them to make sense for the buttons. Right Bumper is for picking things up, so I'd say that is agreeably the way you'd pick up an enemy. I would say that I disagree with your moves otherwise.

Once you're holding an enemy, clicking:
- B will cause you to swing the enemy you're holding as a melee weapon
- Left Trigger will cause you to throw the enemy you're holding
- Right Bumper will cause you to drop the enemy you're holding

Anything more complex derails the focus of the game. In one-v-one fighters it works to have combos because you're only keeping an eye on an enemy in a two-dimensional environment. In Halo 3 and likely Reach, it'll be multiple enemies in a three-dimensional environment.

I would like these moves as options in the game. I don't see them being useful much, but when they are useful, they're definately very useful.

  • 10.12.2009 4:34 PM PDT

Posted by: Jonzx5
Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time.

Allow me to be blunt: Making a game darker by adding more and more blood is a simpleminded way to achieve your goal. There are ways to achieve a dark "mood" in a game without turning it into a blood fountain GOW clone. Introduce characters that the player gets attached to and likes, then kill them off, thats one way to do it. Presenting the player with mass destruction of things they love and making them feel hopeless to stop is another.

But achieving the goal by throwing blood and gore at it? Its as stupid as if Bungie were to add a smiley face onto the sun at the end of Halo 3 to achieve a hopeful and optimistic mood to the game.

Let GOW have it's niche of being a gore hose shooter. Bungie doesn't need to compete with it or even acknowledge it. They have made a video game series that has remained invincible for eight years. Do you know how many "Halo Killers" other companies have tried to release? All of them failed!

You know how Bungie makes their games? They make games that they like, and hope that other people like them. As the nail in the coffin in this thread, allow me to point out the following:

In Halo CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3, all the flood were dismemberable. Why didn't Bungie make it so you could dismember the other enemies in the game? The technology was there. But why did they not do it?

Because they didn't want to. Because gore for the sake of gore is immature and pointless. Making the flood dismemberable created a sense of revulsion and horror that reminds the player that what he is fighting is definitely not human or perhaps even alive and is an abomination to the galaxy. They do not need to create the same effect for the covenant.

If you think that Bungie felt the need to gore up Halo to keep it popular, that they would have done it In the last eight years?

You know what makes a game stale really really fast? Repetitive gameplay. I won't play through the campaign more than two times if I'm forced to watch the same damn animation of a spartan ripping off a jackals arm and throwing it. You know why I never played Fallout 3 beyond level 5? Because I got tired of watching people explode in predictibly stupid fashions.

The entire run jump melee formula might be eight years old, but damn is it so much better than repetitive cutscenes.

Go play Gears of War OP. I can ensure you that Halo will never be like this.

  • 10.12.2009 5:07 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time.

Allow me to be blunt: Making a game darker by adding more and more blood is a simpleminded way to achieve your goal. There are ways to achieve a dark "mood" in a game without turning it into a blood fountain GOW clone. Introduce characters that the player gets attached to and likes, then kill them off, thats one way to do it. Presenting the player with mass destruction of things they love and making them feel hopeless to stop is another.

But achieving the goal by throwing blood and gore at it? Its as stupid as if Bungie were to add a smiley face onto the sun at the end of Halo 3 to achieve a hopeful and optimistic mood to the game.

Let GOW have it's niche of being a gore hose shooter. Bungie doesn't need to compete with it or even acknowledge it. They have made a video game series that has remained invincible for eight years. Do you know how many "Halo Killers" other companies have tried to release? All of them failed!

You know how Bungie makes their games? They make games that they like, and hope that other people like them. As the nail in the coffin in this thread, allow me to point out the following:

In Halo CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3, all the flood were dismemberable. Why didn't Bungie make it so you could dismember the other enemies in the game? The technology was there. But why did they not do it?

Because they didn't want to. Because gore for the sake of gore is immature and pointless. Making the flood dismemberable created a sense of revulsion and horror that reminds the player that what he is fighting is definitely not human or perhaps even alive and is an abomination to the galaxy. They do not need to create the same effect for the covenant.

If you think that Bungie felt the need to gore up Halo to keep it popular, that they would have done it In the last eight years?

You know what makes a game stale really really fast? Repetitive gameplay. I won't play through the campaign more than two times if I'm forced to watch the same damn animation of a spartan ripping off a jackals arm and throwing it. You know why I never played Fallout 3 beyond level 5? Because I got tired of watching people explode in predictibly stupid fashions.

The entire run jump melee formula might be eight years old, but damn is it so much better than repetitive cutscenes.

Go play Gears of War OP. I can ensure you that Halo will never be like this.


It's not about the gore. Its about the new stuff. So your tired of watching people explode in predictibly stupid fashions, but your not tired of tapping enemies with the back of your gun in the same fashion millions of times?

  • 10.12.2009 5:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Firstly, it enhances the gameplay, and shows the ability of Spartan's more.

Secondly, I don't know, why don't you ask the spartan near the end of this vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A6lojxvmy4

Thirdly, Yes he did "Rip Apart" the ODST's. It states that he was "tearing limb's and breaking bones like toothpicks" or something similar to that.

  • 10.12.2009 5:40 PM PDT

Posted by: Jonzx5
So your tired of watching people explode in predictibly stupid fashions, but your not tired of tapping enemies with the back of your gun in the same fashion millions of times?

I'm an active participant in tapping enemies with my gun in the same fashion millions of times. Its much more engaging than being a passive participant in watching my character rip my enemies unnecessarily limb from limb.

And good use of extreme case reasoning by the way, you are learning well.

  • 10.12.2009 5:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
So your tired of watching people explode in predictibly stupid fashions, but your not tired of tapping enemies with the back of your gun in the same fashion millions of times?

I'm an active participant in tapping enemies with my gun in the same fashion millions of times. Its much more engaging than being a passive participant in watching my character rip my enemies unnecessarily limb from limb.

And good use of extreme case reasoning by the way, you are learning well.


Oh that makes sense. Watching someone blow up in the same fashion over and over is equally boring as watching your character smack someone in the same fashion over and over, yet you think smacking someone in the same fashion over and over is more engaging?

Btw...how is that extreme reasoning? It seems very obvious to me.

  • 10.12.2009 5:47 PM PDT

lucky member no.999 of SAS Halo3

Posted by: Jonzx5
Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
Ok, now you are just going over the top. "A backflip before throwing them"? Stop it.


You have clearly never heard of extreme case reasoning. Its where you exagerate on purpous to prove a certain point. In this case, I am exagerating your wants for "awesome moves" to show how silly it seems to me. Its a good tool to utilize to win your arguements, I suggest learning to use it.


You clearly know very little about the real world. A spin kick will generate more kenetic energy, and will result in a more powerfull blow than if you just punched someone.

I clearly know little about the real world and "kinetic" energy eh? Heres a little problem that you have overlooked however, if you are a spartan, and you can kill someone by punching them why waste the time doing a spinning kick to accomplish the same result?

[Warning: Following paragraph may contain a Extreme Case Reasoning. Continue Reading at your own risk.]
Its like trying to fish catch fish by using a pistol. Its more expensive, and doesn't really get you a better result than catching the fish using a rod.


As for the grenade-in-mouth thing, it was not meant to be flashy at all. It was meant to be Brutal.

Brutal for what reason? Does Master Chief hate the Covenant? Did they kill his wife and children? Did he set out on a personal vendetta to slaughter them all? No. Its all about motivation. He is simply a soldier, following orders to protect humanity. He doesn't have time to hate his enemies. He just wants to get the mission done as fast as possible. Thats what millitary training from the age of six does to a person. It creates efficient killers. So it would seem a bit odd to see a spartan all of a sudden doing these brutal things, and would make me scratch my head as the player, and destroys the suspension of disbelief that the game had maintained to that point.

Did I mention "spinning" a jackal around? No. What I said was this: Grab their arm, and rip it off. Simple


But in a battle of simplicity, just breaking their spine with a beatdown works, which is all that matters.


LOL...Just because you diddn't lose your family does not mean you cannot do brutal things on the battlefield. Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time. Also, Spartan's can't kill a Brute in a single punch, I don't think they can kill an Elite in a single punch either (Maybe they can, I'm not completely sure).
Watch this to the end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A6lojxvmy4

Moves such as "spin kicking" were not created to look fancy, they were created to be effective, and happen to look "fancy" in the proccess. Besides, it would be really dissapointing to see the same old walk, jump, melee gameplay that is 8 years old as I mentioned before. Things like this new combat system will enhance the Halo experience.

do you realize how incredibly poinless this would be? sereously looks vs effficencey halo: reach is supposed to be a futuristic war game not a "homocidal scycopath texas chainsaw massicere game"

  • 10.12.2009 5:48 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

just get out you have horrible ideas and now everybody hates u

[Edited on 10.12.2009 5:52 PM PDT]

  • 10.12.2009 5:51 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Defiant Assasin
Posted by: Jonzx5
Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Jonzx5
Ok, now you are just going over the top. "A backflip before throwing them"? Stop it.


You have clearly never heard of extreme case reasoning. Its where you exagerate on purpous to prove a certain point. In this case, I am exagerating your wants for "awesome moves" to show how silly it seems to me. Its a good tool to utilize to win your arguements, I suggest learning to use it.


You clearly know very little about the real world. A spin kick will generate more kenetic energy, and will result in a more powerfull blow than if you just punched someone.

I clearly know little about the real world and "kinetic" energy eh? Heres a little problem that you have overlooked however, if you are a spartan, and you can kill someone by punching them why waste the time doing a spinning kick to accomplish the same result?

[Warning: Following paragraph may contain a Extreme Case Reasoning. Continue Reading at your own risk.]
Its like trying to fish catch fish by using a pistol. Its more expensive, and doesn't really get you a better result than catching the fish using a rod.


As for the grenade-in-mouth thing, it was not meant to be flashy at all. It was meant to be Brutal.

Brutal for what reason? Does Master Chief hate the Covenant? Did they kill his wife and children? Did he set out on a personal vendetta to slaughter them all? No. Its all about motivation. He is simply a soldier, following orders to protect humanity. He doesn't have time to hate his enemies. He just wants to get the mission done as fast as possible. Thats what millitary training from the age of six does to a person. It creates efficient killers. So it would seem a bit odd to see a spartan all of a sudden doing these brutal things, and would make me scratch my head as the player, and destroys the suspension of disbelief that the game had maintained to that point.

Did I mention "spinning" a jackal around? No. What I said was this: Grab their arm, and rip it off. Simple


But in a battle of simplicity, just breaking their spine with a beatdown works, which is all that matters.


LOL...Just because you diddn't lose your family does not mean you cannot do brutal things on the battlefield. Many people have been asking for a darker halo, and I agree. Killing using tactics such as ripping limbs and shouving grenades in the mouth's of enemies will make this game darker, while providing entertainment at the same time. Also, Spartan's can't kill a Brute in a single punch, I don't think they can kill an Elite in a single punch either (Maybe they can, I'm not completely sure).
Watch this to the end:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A6lojxvmy4

Moves such as "spin kicking" were not created to look fancy, they were created to be effective, and happen to look "fancy" in the proccess. Besides, it would be really dissapointing to see the same old walk, jump, melee gameplay that is 8 years old as I mentioned before. Things like this new combat system will enhance the Halo experience.

do you realize how incredibly poinless this would be? sereously looks vs effficencey halo: reach is supposed to be a futuristic war game not a "homocidal scycopath texas chainsaw massicere game"


Spell check please. Anyways, im off for the night. Laterz.

  • 10.12.2009 5:51 PM PDT

I just have one question, would it be in multiplayer?

  • 10.12.2009 5:53 PM PDT

Im high in fiber!

This is best solved by saying Jonzx5 is trying to over complicate halo and make it something it isn't. He should just go play GOW 2 or Assasins Creed.

Also he's a a fat looser because he threatened to spin kick someone over the internet. Thats such a fat kid thing to say.

Posted by: Jonzx5
Also, if you want, I can spin kick you in the face and we can both see how effective it is.


What an Ubernerd

[Edited on 10.12.2009 6:11 PM PDT]

  • 10.12.2009 6:06 PM PDT

"You are somthing the whole universe is doing, in the same way a wave is somthing the whole ocean is doing."

Mabye they could just make the Chuck Norris Skull that when you are in campaign you do these randomly at a certain %. And you screem "Your messing with the wrong guy!" LOFL. Or not.

  • 10.12.2009 6:37 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

A Spartan does not enjoy causing pain on their enemies, they are not mindless cyborg killing machines. They fight for humanity because they KNOW that it is their duty to sacrifice themselves, if need be, in order to protect what remains of the Human race. The best way to eliminate a threat is either to kill or render a target unconscious. Since the Covenant (well the prophets anyway) are hell bent on "cleansing the human filth from the face of the galaxy."

Since it is likely that a Sangheili warrior will recover and attempt to reengage the enemy if he is knocked unconscious. Therefore the best option would be to either secure (capture) or remove the threat (kill). Spartans on Reach do not have time to capture a Sangheili warrior, and thus they would usually kill them in combat, as FAST AS POSSIBLE, because there are thousands more trying to overrun the generators on Reach. Using unnecessarily brutal and violent methods that take up FAR TOO MUCH time do not accomplish this.

The only species present on Reach who would "rip off limbs" and toss them into the enemy would be a Brute, since they know that it intimidates the enemy, are barbaric enough and they DO have the time to do this, since there are only a few defenders left on Reach.

Also I have read "Halo: The Fall of Reach" and while John-117 does knockout three hand to hand combat trainers (who happened to be ODSTs), he was following the orders of a superior officer. He dispatched them in the exact same efficient manner, first punching one guy so hard that his bones broke, then quickly grabbing an iron bar another man swung at him and using it to crack his pelvis, before knocking out the other two men. He did not mean to kill any of them, but because of his enhanced strength, he was able to kill three out of four ODSTs. He later had a bad feeling about this, since the ODSTs were still soldiers in the UNSC, and fellow servicemen. Mendez told them that he followed orders, and that was all that mattered.

So therefore your points are not valid, and we should not have "Gears of War" style executions because it simply does not fit the style of the efficient soldiers that the SPARTANs, ODSTs and any other class of ground or naval troops trained in the UNSC.

  • 10.12.2009 8:39 PM PDT

Posted by: Jonzx5
Spell check please.


Oh, that's rich. Trying to compensate for your terrible arguments by insulting a guy for his spelling? Think you're a badass now? You have absolutely no right to make fun of his spelling given the numerous errors you have made yourself. Shall I remind you of some of the more memorable ones?

"Kenetic" is spelled "Kinetic"
"Powerfull" is spelled "Powerful"
"Peformed" is spelled "Performed"
"diddn't" is spelled "didn't"
"shouving" is spelled "shoving"

Shall I go on? There's way more than that.

  • 10.12.2009 10:50 PM PDT
  • gamertag: tsassi
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Jonzx5
Heres some stuff I think Spartan's should be able to do:
Walk up to an enemy and press RB, you will grab the grunt and lift him up while switching to 3rd person mode. Then, you have a few choices:
For Grunts:

*Press RB again: Throw the grunt in any direction you point at (even in to other enemies)
*Press LT (grenade button): Rip off the grunts mask, mush a grenade into his mouth, and pitch him into which ever direction your pointing at
*Press B: Smash the grunt into the ground sending blood splattering all over the screen.

For Shielded Jackals:

*Press B: Grab the jackal by the hand (the one with the plasma pistol that is exposed from the shield), and swing the Jackal in the air while ripping his arm off.

For Jackal sniper's/Unshielded Jackals:

*Same 3 Grunt options
*Tap B twice: Toss the Jackal in the air, grab it by both arms, then rip both arms off leaving an armless Jackal bleeding out on the ground.

For Elites/Brutes:

*Press RB again: Toss him (same as grunts)
*Press LT: Stick a nade in his mouth and toss him (same as grunts)
*Press B: Give the elite a slight toss upwards, and double spin kung foo 1337 kick him sending him flying.

For Hammer wielding Brute's and Sword wielding Elite's:

*When he swings, press RB at the right time, and you will block the swing and go into a "Sword/Hammer lock" kinda like GOW2's chainsaw duels. Tap B as fast as you can, if you win, you make him stagger backwards, then peform an ultra cool combo and beat the sh_t out of him.

All of these moves should be peformed really quickly so that it does not ruin the flow of the game. Anyone else like these ideas?

Are you some kind of psychopath?

  • 10.12.2009 11:22 PM PDT

Posted by: tsassi2
Posted by: Jonzx5
Heres some stuff I think Spartan's should be able to do:
Walk up to an enemy and press RB, you will grab the grunt and lift him up while switching to 3rd person mode. Then, you have a few choices:
For Grunts:

*Press RB again: Throw the grunt in any direction you point at (even in to other enemies)
*Press LT (grenade button): Rip off the grunts mask, mush a grenade into his mouth, and pitch him into which ever direction your pointing at
*Press B: Smash the grunt into the ground sending blood splattering all over the screen.

For Shielded Jackals:

*Press B: Grab the jackal by the hand (the one with the plasma pistol that is exposed from the shield), and swing the Jackal in the air while ripping his arm off.

For Jackal sniper's/Unshielded Jackals:

*Same 3 Grunt options
*Tap B twice: Toss the Jackal in the air, grab it by both arms, then rip both arms off leaving an armless Jackal bleeding out on the ground.

For Elites/Brutes:

*Press RB again: Toss him (same as grunts)
*Press LT: Stick a nade in his mouth and toss him (same as grunts)
*Press B: Give the elite a slight toss upwards, and double spin kung foo 1337 kick him sending him flying.

For Hammer wielding Brute's and Sword wielding Elite's:

*When he swings, press RB at the right time, and you will block the swing and go into a "Sword/Hammer lock" kinda like GOW2's chainsaw duels. Tap B as fast as you can, if you win, you make him stagger backwards, then peform an ultra cool combo and beat the sh_t out of him.

All of these moves should be peformed really quickly so that it does not ruin the flow of the game. Anyone else like these ideas?

Are you some kind of psychopath?

Don't get him started about the spinning kicks...

  • 10.12.2009 11:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Raawry
  • user homepage:

Contribute to 10,000,000,000 covie kills!

I can sum up my opinion on this in one word.

No.

  • 10.12.2009 11:50 PM PDT

Posted by: Ushan
Because Muslims surgically implant organic bombs in their testicles, which in turn will be injected into women during sex, which will grow into BABY BOMBS!

Posted by: Jonzx5
Posted by: Po0f MoNk3y
Posted by: ChadxxVader
It would ruin the gameplay, Halo is run and gun.

Besides, imagine trying to do this on Legendary while like 15 grunts, 4 jackals, and 2 Elites are shooting at you.


So don't do it when there's tons of enemies around.

I'd certainly like to see a Spartan's true strength and ability this time around.


Exactly what I was thinking. Spartan's should have more abilitys. In the books, John rips apart a couple of ODST's with his hands. I would love to see him or other spartans Rip apart enemys with their bare hands in game.


Sure, John beats up the ODSTs but he never rips of thier limbs. The other Spartans also don't kill their enemies like that. If anything they just break a few arms and necks. Spartans get the job done quickly and efficiently, they don't try to show off with the retarded moves you mentioned.

People in this forum come up with such stupid ideas.
May I ask, have you read the books properly? Cos it doesn't seem like it.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 12:37 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 12:33 AM PDT

Its called Gears of War 3.
Spartans wouldn't do these things.
And doing this will not make a "darker" Halo, if anything it will make it more cartoon but bloodier.

Gore doesn't mean Dark.

  • 10.13.2009 1:38 AM PDT

Betatesters are disposable.

I think the OPs idea is good, but it's not halo-like.

  • 10.13.2009 1:49 AM PDT

Nihilism (from the Latin nihil, nothing) is a philosophical position that argues that existence is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value.

Put simply in the words of Nietzsche as "the will to nothingness".

Posted by: orion43
Then, after the said enemy dies, you hear the announcer say "Fatality!" That would be sweet. =p

Sure, if you're twelve.

  • 10.13.2009 2:55 AM PDT

Posted by: Nihilistic NG
Posted by: orion43
Then, after the said enemy dies, you hear the announcer say "Fatality!" That would be sweet. =p

Sure, if you're twelve.


Or if you're being sarcastic... guess I fail =[

[Edited on 10.13.2009 6:06 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 6:03 AM PDT

Posted by: orion43
Posted by: Nihilistic NG
Posted by: orion43
Then, after the said enemy dies, you hear the announcer say "Fatality!" That would be sweet. =p

Sure, if you're twelve.


Or if you're being sarcastic... guess I fail =[

You could have said it in all caps with terrible spelling and we would have gotten the point.

  • 10.13.2009 9:06 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3