Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo Reach vs modern warfare 2
  • Subject: Halo Reach vs modern warfare 2
Subject: Halo Reach vs modern warfare 2

which will be the better game in your opinion

  • 10.12.2009 9:25 PM PDT

Tallahassee?
I spent two weeks in Tallahassee one night.

Reach. MW2 Looks good but Bungie will go above and beyond what MW2 has.

  • 10.12.2009 9:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

1: It's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too early to tell.

2: This is not the place for that.

[Edited on 10.12.2009 9:28 PM PDT]

  • 10.12.2009 9:28 PM PDT

PEANUT-BUTTER SLAP!

Why would you ask this on a Halo forum set up by the company that made the games?!

  • 10.12.2009 9:28 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

M=17+ Not 11

You're kidding right. The two games are being released almost year apart. Which one will have better graphics, sound and overall gameplay.

[Edited on 10.12.2009 9:29 PM PDT]

  • 10.12.2009 9:29 PM PDT

i like halo more but no one can judge just yet, too early to tell with reach being released next year... GO BUNGIE!

  • 10.12.2009 9:31 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Mack117
You're kidding right. The two games are being released almost year apart. Which one will have better graphics, sound and overall gameplay.
This is irrelevant. The game released prior may actually look, play, and sound better.

Technology, though advancing fairly quickly, takes a while to be applied in a functional and efficient way that looks amazing. Like I said, it's too early to tell which is going to be better.

  • 10.12.2009 9:37 PM PDT

How can you compare 2 games that aren't even out yet? Plus, absolutely nothing has been shown of Reach yet. For all we know, it could be a 1st person Halo version of Checkers. Also, this is a Halo forum so I think you already know the answers...

  • 10.12.2009 9:40 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Senior Legendary Member

Posted by: BTE
Posted by: Xharpan
it doese'nt look nextgen , looks good but not nextgen
If by next-gen you mean crappy, dark and colorless, I agree. It doesnt look next-gen at all.

This thread is dumb. Why? You made it in the BUNGIE forums. Go to the CoD forums and im sure the opinions will be the opposite.

Add to that the fact that niether game is out, plus we know NOTHING about Reach.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 1:01 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 1:01 AM PDT

Reach should be better, purely because it has an extra year development time. MW 2 is this year and reach is next, so they shouldn't really be compared.

  • 10.13.2009 1:33 AM PDT

Three-time legendary member on a single account

If Halo: Reach is more of the same Halo we've seen four times over already, MW2.

  • 10.13.2009 1:54 AM PDT

Twitter | Raptr | Facebook
------------------------------------------
Let me change my username! Pwease, I'd do anything! :'(
------------------------------------------
Xbox Ambassador

It's an impossible question because nobody knows what Reach is like at the moment, you'd be better off comparing it to Halo : ODST.

  • 10.13.2009 1:58 AM PDT

Who give beat down? We give beat down!

Why do people feel the need to do this?
Yeah, lets compare two games that aren't even out yet.
>_>

  • 10.13.2009 1:59 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Legendary Member
  • gamertag: Rylite
  • user homepage:

You Shall Not Pass!!!

Modern Warfare 2 will probably just be like the most recent Call of Duty titles. Fun for a little while, but just more of the same. A basic story and a stale multiplayer.

However, I think Reach has potential. I'd like to play the campaign as it is a major part of the Halo story. The Halo multiplayer is always good, so it should be a quality game.

Legend has a point though, we can't really tell until we play both games.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 2:06 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 2:05 AM PDT

Nihilism (from the Latin nihil, nothing) is a philosophical position that argues that existence is without objective meaning, purpose, or intrinsic value.

Put simply in the words of Nietzsche as "the will to nothingness".

Idiotic thread, reach comes out nearly a year after MW2. It's obvious which one will be better, REACH.

  • 10.13.2009 2:48 AM PDT

Corn, Oil, and Wine... We need more wine...

Posted by: Anonymous101
1: It's waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too early to tell.

2: This is not the place for that.

  • 10.13.2009 3:43 AM PDT

I agree, it is too early to tell, but let me make this statement:

Halo and Call of Duty both have great series of games, but they have totally different play styles. Yes, they are both FPS games and good ones at that but they are both played differently so its all based on which style you like to play.

I also wanna point out that the Halo fans are going to obviously say Halo, and people who like CoD will say CoD.

In my own opinion, Bungie had me hooked when they released the first Halo, then Halo 2 came out and it was a very fun game but I still love the first one. If they make another pretty game and have new guns or remodel the old ones, either way I think it will be an awesome action-packed game. This also goes for CoD. When the second CoD game came out i loved it. I did not like CoD4 much but i do play it from time to time with friends. I do like how MW2 is looking in the all the videos but if it was up to me to decide between the two right now with the information i know about both series, i would chose halo, but there is a long time before you can actually make the right decision.

  • 10.13.2009 7:01 AM PDT

It's impossible to decide for us because we know almost nothing about Reach. I think anyone who automatically says Reach is better is just a mindless fanboy.

Also, how come a game is automatically better if it comes out a year later than another game? That logic makes no sense at all. Super Mario Bros. came out in 1985 but it's still better than a lot of games that came out recently, and that's a lot more than a year.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 7:06 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 7:03 AM PDT

Posted by: Covenant Killer
Reach should be better, purely because it has an extra year development time. MW 2 is this year and reach is next, so they shouldn't really be compared.


Yet people still say that Halo 1 is better then Halo 3. Look at the year diffrence in that.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 7:04 AM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 7:04 AM PDT

Old gt: xreaper09x

Honestly i bet reach will be awsome, but MW2 will probably be the best game you can buy for the 360, we all know how big halo 3 was when it launched, well when MW2 comes out i gaurantee you it will make halo 3 release look like a joke

  • 10.13.2009 7:10 AM PDT

919263146451025311493204END
1119996204135253422342538320242END
10234254236384412425512455175END
919525486131742032515267END

Modern Dwarf Fairs can suck it. Halo rules.

  • 10.13.2009 7:12 AM PDT