Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: Cod 6 v.s Halo REACH
  • Subject: Cod 6 v.s Halo REACH
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Cod 6 v.s Halo REACH

Stupidity, when sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic

You'd get different results on a cod forum (halo still rocks though)

  • 10.13.2009 7:02 PM PDT

A Hell Jumper - Heroic, a Spartan - Legendary, be We're Mythic; Spartan Mythic Team.
Mythic Actual / Mythic 1
Post to everyone who complains about Reach instead of shutting up and playing something else. http://initiativedesignz.webs.com/HaloReachStuff/Fixn.jpg

Everyone knows CoD fans, hardcore fans & fanboys hate ANYTHING that has to do w/ Halo ((except MAYBE RvB)). Its no wonder why ppl are talking mad shist. can't say a game that hasn't come out is better than another.

  • 10.13.2009 7:02 PM PDT

EB

Posted by: BTE
Posted by: Eric45823
How is it dumb just vote are you a fan of Cod or halo?
Because this is the HALO FORUMS. You will see that the majority of the people will vote for HALO.

Also in the HALO fourms ive been seeing that cod is better than halo on a HALO website so thought i might just make a theard

  • 10.13.2009 7:03 PM PDT

I started out liking Cod before i liked halo, but know i like halo better. If Cod had map editing, easy machinima capability, body plating customization, and party play [e.g. Custom Games] than i would love it.
I miss the good old days of xbox 360 Cod 2. Everyone says that 4 is their favorite, but if most people had a mic and live and cod2 at its peak, than that would be their favorite. *sniffle sniffle*

  • 10.13.2009 7:04 PM PDT

I don't want to be in your group quit spamming me

Posted by: Eric45823
Posted by: crzymnky069
all they've released is a teaser trailer, how can anybody say it's better than cod6. that's -blam!- retarded

we are just expressing are opions for halo reach and cod6


no, you're basing which game is better off of no info whatsoever. you don't know a single gameplay/story aspect about Reach, and you barely know anything about "cod 6". It's modern warfare 2, by the way, learn the name of a game before you bash it.

  • 10.13.2009 7:04 PM PDT

"I just had my picture taken in class. Yup, I'm pretty sure that was the most awkward moment all week."
"Man, I love Halo."
-'07
------------------------------
I still love Halo. I've played it since 2001; Christmas was sweet.
-Fall of '09

I really wanted to bash and gnash, but I remembered that we are, after all, talking about Bungie. CoD is good, but it's not Halo good.

  • 10.13.2009 7:06 PM PDT

Keep your Friends close and your Enimes closer.

Posted by: Eric45823
Ok you guys i am sick and tired hearing people argue about Cod beats halo and it will out sell halo 3 on the first night if you want to fight this will be the place to do just simply vote and see which one wins.I vote Halo REACH how many of us want to see new weapons and play as differnt spartans.Lets vote people!lets FIGHT!

Please, this is stupid. The Only reason 95% of the Poll has REACH is because this is a Reach FORUM. Put this on CoD Forum and then we'll see who has 95%

  • 10.13.2009 7:11 PM PDT

This is the Halo Reach Forum. That means people are here to talk and hear about Reach. Which one do you think they'd vote for? It's completely biased.

  • 10.13.2009 7:12 PM PDT

The less than a second latency of online play is a better system to play off of than more health.

You realize this system is just as host based, right? because if you're fighting host, or someone with a better connection to host, and you each start firing at the same time, his BULLETS will register first, giving him slightly more health if the melees happen at the same time.

So would you rather have the BS of both, or just one?

-HaVOk1228

STOP THE FIGHTING,
Play both and enjoy the win!

  • 10.13.2009 7:17 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

Mw2 (not cod mw 2) will beat halo 3, its a given, halo 3 is 2-3
years old.. but verses reach...idk reach hasnt shown any gameplay vids yet.

  • 10.13.2009 7:17 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

wait... theres a call of duty 6? why wasnt i informed...meh im to interested in modern warfare 2.

  • 10.13.2009 7:20 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

GRUNT BUD!!!!!

you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists

  • 10.13.2009 7:21 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

MW2 will most likly win,
for example there are
10 pc gamers,
6 xbox gamers,
and 5 ps3 gamers.
for MW2
9/10 pc gamers will buy MW2
5/5 ps3 gamers will buy MW2 (there isnt any good games for ps3)
2/6 xbox gamers will buy MW2
3/6 xbox gamers will buy reach
1/6 xbox gamers buy both
nobody else will buy, because unlike halo, MW is multi-platform.

17/21 for MW2
4/21 for halo

halo would win if mw2 was xbox only, but that is not the case.
this is purly my interprecation of the current situation.
4/6

  • 10.13.2009 7:33 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...

  • 10.13.2009 7:33 PM PDT

Your in a halo Reach forum. Why bother taking a vote.

  • 10.13.2009 7:50 PM PDT

Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
MW2 will most likly win,
for example there are
10 pc gamers,
6 xbox gamers,
and 5 ps3 gamers.
for MW2
9/10 pc gamers will buy MW2
5/5 ps3 gamers will buy MW2 (there isnt any good games for ps3)
2/6 xbox gamers will buy MW2
3/6 xbox gamers will buy reach
1/6 xbox gamers buy both
nobody else will buy, because unlike halo, MW is multi-platform.

17/21 for MW2
4/21 for halo

halo would win if mw2 was xbox only, but that is not the case.
this is purly my interprecation of the current situation.
4/6


I disagree with your 1/6 will buy both. I think almost everyone who owns an xbox will buy both.

  • 10.13.2009 7:52 PM PDT

I would like to invite you to the most active group there is, Black Water Ops. Boasting over 4000 members this is one of the fastest growing groups and proven to be one of the most active b.net groups. An amazing experience awaits you with weekly game nights, photo contests, and forging contests. This is one decision you won't regret. Welcome to the family!

It's not CoD 6 'tard, it's Modern Warfare 2. Learn to type.

And get some brains too.

  • 10.13.2009 7:53 PM PDT

I would like to invite you to the most active group there is, Black Water Ops. Boasting over 4000 members this is one of the fastest growing groups and proven to be one of the most active b.net groups. An amazing experience awaits you with weekly game nights, photo contests, and forging contests. This is one decision you won't regret. Welcome to the family!

Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...

NO!!!! It was not called CoD 5: World at War, it was called CoD: World at War.

There have been way more than just 5 Call of Duty's. So I could call Reach Halo 5 then, huh? (Halo:CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo Wars...)

Seriously....I hate it when people think there's CoD 5 and 6.

  • 10.13.2009 7:56 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

Posted by: BIGNERENT
Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
MW2 will most likly win,
for example there are
10 pc gamers,
6 xbox gamers,
and 5 ps3 gamers.
for MW2
9/10 pc gamers will buy MW2
5/5 ps3 gamers will buy MW2 (there isnt any good games for ps3)
2/6 xbox gamers will buy MW2
3/6 xbox gamers will buy reach
1/6 xbox gamers buy both
nobody else will buy, because unlike halo, MW is multi-platform.

17/21 for MW2
4/21 for halo

halo would win if mw2 was xbox only, but that is not the case.
this is purly my interprecation of the current situation.
4/6


I disagree with your 1/6 will buy both. I think almost everyone who owns an xbox will buy both.
maybe, then again i know quite a few MW fanboys who would die before playing halo 3.

  • 10.13.2009 8:01 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

Posted by: GBspot117
Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...

NO!!!! It was not called CoD 5: World at War, it was called CoD: World at War.

There have been way more than just 5 Call of Duty's. So I could call Reach Halo 5 then, huh? (Halo:CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo Wars...)

Seriously....I hate it when people think there's CoD 5 and 6.
i intended it to be the "5th call of duty game" my apologies i hate it too. and for the odd few mw2 isnt part of the cod series.

there have been more than 5 call of duties?
cod: finest hour
cod 2
cod 3
cod 4 Mw
cod waw

i count 5.

[Edited on 10.13.2009 8:05 PM PDT]

  • 10.13.2009 8:03 PM PDT

Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GBspot117
Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...

NO!!!! It was not called CoD 5: World at War, it was called CoD: World at War.

There have been way more than just 5 Call of Duty's. So I could call Reach Halo 5 then, huh? (Halo:CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo Wars...)

Seriously....I hate it when people think there's CoD 5 and 6.
i intended it to be the "5th call of duty game" my apologies i hate it too. and for the odd few mw2 isnt part of the cod series.


Except, it is.

  • 10.13.2009 8:04 PM PDT

Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...


If they numbered every different call of duty game, WaW would be in the double digits. So all the idiots that keep calling Call of Duty: World at War COD5, stop calling it that. WaW was crap and only had the title of a call of duty game so Activision could milk a once awesome franchise that is constantly being held down by sorry games like WaW.
So by COD6 i'm guessing you mean Modern Warfare 2. it's impossible to judge 2 games that for Reach we don't have a clue about and for MW2 it's a year apart from Reach and hasn't been released yet

  • 10.13.2009 8:05 PM PDT

If you're sick and tired of hearing the arguements, why did you make this poll?

  • 10.13.2009 8:07 PM PDT

To be quite honest we know next to nothing of Reach, so it's an inconclusive aregument.

As for CoD 6 being a "Halo killer" (as one particularly coniving Game Stop employee told me to try and get me to pre-order CoD6) I think that they are incredibly way off base on that remark. It seems like every halfway decent FPS that comes out is labelled a "Halo killer" but people get it, play it, and then come back to Halo because whatever anyone wants to say about it it is the best out there.

  • 10.13.2009 8:07 PM PDT

The strongest Rivals are also the strongest allies.

Posted by: azliand
Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GBspot117
Posted by: BOB THE DOCTER
Posted by: GRUNT BUD
you do understand there is no such thing as cod 6 as well as no cod 5 so Im gonna go for the one that actually exists
cod 5 was COD: world at war...

NO!!!! It was not called CoD 5: World at War, it was called CoD: World at War.

There have been way more than just 5 Call of Duty's. So I could call Reach Halo 5 then, huh? (Halo:CE, Halo 2, Halo 3, Halo Wars...)

Seriously....I hate it when people think there's CoD 5 and 6.
i intended it to be the "5th call of duty game" my apologies i hate it too. and for the odd few mw2 isnt part of the cod series.


Except, it is.
nope, infinity ward broke away from cod, like bungie with microsoft, check the box art, its just Moden warfare 2. check, and mate.

  • 10.13.2009 8:08 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4