Halo: Reach Forum
This topic has moved here: Subject: How about 32 player matches in Reach
  • Subject: How about 32 player matches in Reach
Subject: How about 32 player matches in Reach
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can be neutral. Neutral means you don't have to pick sides in an argument. Also knows as Independent.

I'm a huge fan of big team because of all the vehicles and chaos that happens. Would anyone here like to 16 vs 16 player matches in the next Halo?

  • 10.14.2009 8:17 PM PDT

But with 15 other players on my team my sense of personal importance goes down. Heck, if I were to quit out, the rest of the team might not even miss me. Theres no chance for me to become a hero. Sure, when theres only four or five people guarding a base, its possible to slip in, kill them all, and then emerge with the flag as a hero, but when theres eight or nine people on defense? It just gets harder and harder to feel important.

And what if my entire team does quit out and I'm the only one left? Then it becomes Team search and kill for 20 minutes.

  • 10.14.2009 8:21 PM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"

Do you enjoy the current lag issues that are prevailent during BTB games? Adding more players to the arena will only make something like this worse. Servers would help, but it will still suffer lag issues due to varying ping rates.

  • 10.14.2009 8:23 PM PDT

Gigitty Gigitty Goo!

that would be awesome fun...

  • 10.14.2009 8:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can be neutral. Neutral means you don't have to pick sides in an argument. Also knows as Independent.

The last thing you said about searching for the last guy is something I forgot about. I wish Bungie could update to where the game would end when there is only 1 person left on a team. I hate when people quit so quickly.

  • 10.14.2009 8:25 PM PDT

Need a dispenser here! Need a dispenser here! Need a dispenser here!

Halo can't have decent 4 vs. 4 matchmaking.

I call this for Custom Games only; too bad Bungie won't learn a thing or two from DICE.

  • 10.14.2009 8:26 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Heroic Member

www.eevince.com
www.polark.deviantart.com

____________________________

They thought they were funny; however, they didn't know they were talking to a peanut farmer from Georgia who knows the value of a peanut.

sounds nice but i would rather stick with 16 since lag will be a issue.

  • 10.14.2009 8:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can be neutral. Neutral means you don't have to pick sides in an argument. Also knows as Independent.

I usually don't have a problem with lag. My internet connection is good. Big team games aren't perfect but its still fun when there is so much going on.

  • 10.14.2009 8:26 PM PDT

Posted by: unemployed
I usually don't have a problem with lag. My internet connection is good. Big team games aren't perfect but its still fun when there is so much going on.

Four times the stuff?

  • 10.14.2009 8:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can be neutral. Neutral means you don't have to pick sides in an argument. Also knows as Independent.

I rarely have problems with 4 v 4 match making. What do you mean, " too bad Bungie won't learn a thing or two from DICE?"

I know DICE developed Battlefield but there online game connections are awful and the hit detection is pretty bad.

  • 10.14.2009 8:29 PM PDT

Need a dispenser here! Need a dispenser here! Need a dispenser here!

1943 Runs beautifully in large games AND hit detection is incredible.

  • 10.14.2009 8:44 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

You can be neutral. Neutral means you don't have to pick sides in an argument. Also knows as Independent.

I was talking about Battlefield Bad Company. I played that for a while and the hit detection was terrible. I tried to sit still and pulse fire but most of the time, I had to unload the whole clip.

  • 10.14.2009 8:48 PM PDT

Can you please, oh dear please, not send me ANY RANDOM GROUP INVITATIONS. You will be blocked.

http://www.youtube.com/TheBestOfSWAT - Halo: Reach SWAT video/commentary

Steam: ii Grim - BFBC2 & Halo PC (Zombie Servers)

Okay, I have another suggestion. How about we all red bar and never die and it takes five minutes to respawn. Sound good?

  • 10.14.2009 8:48 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Noble Legendary Member
  • gamertag: goobot
  • user homepage:

what is this halo you speak of?

Posted by: Hylebos
But with 15 other players on my team my sense of personal importance goes down. Heck, if I were to quit out, the rest of the team might not even miss me. Theres no chance for me to become a hero. Sure, when theres only four or five people guarding a base, its possible to slip in, kill them all, and then emerge with the flag as a hero, but when theres eight or nine people on defense? It just gets harder and harder to feel important.

And what if my entire team does quit out and I'm the only one left? Then it becomes Team search and kill for 20 minutes.


or this one playlist can be for fun like the game is ment for?

  • 10.14.2009 8:50 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

Posted by: Bullet Storm
Halo can't have decent 4 vs. 4 matchmaking.



?...

  • 10.14.2009 8:50 PM PDT